Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discuss: Use turbo-http instead of native http module #1083

Closed
bajtos opened this issue Mar 5, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Discuss: Use turbo-http instead of native http module #1083

bajtos opened this issue Mar 5, 2018 · 3 comments
Labels
REST Issues related to @loopback/rest package and REST transport in general stale

Comments

@bajtos
Copy link
Member

bajtos commented Mar 5, 2018

Quoting from https://github.com/mafintosh/turbo-http:

WIP, this module is already really fast but there are some HTTP features missing and easy perf gains to be had.
On my laptop I can serve simple hello world payloads at around 100k requests/seconds compared to 10k requests/second using node core.

Should we consider switching our REST layer to turbo-http when the library becomes more stable?

@bajtos bajtos added discussion REST Issues related to @loopback/rest package and REST transport in general labels Mar 5, 2018
@raymondfeng
Copy link
Contributor

If we agree on the approach proposed by #1082, the http implementation can be pluggable for LoopBack 4.

@dhmlau dhmlau added the non-DP3 label Apr 19, 2018
@dhmlau dhmlau removed the non-DP3 label Aug 23, 2018
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Sep 17, 2019

This issue has been marked stale because it has not seen activity within six months. If you believe this to be in error, please contact one of the code owners, listed in the CODEOWNERS file at the top-level of this repository. This issue will be closed within 30 days of being stale.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Sep 17, 2019
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Oct 17, 2019

This issue has been closed due to continued inactivity. Thank you for your understanding. If you believe this to be in error, please contact one of the code owners, listed in the CODEOWNERS file at the top-level of this repository.

@stale stale bot closed this as completed Oct 17, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
REST Issues related to @loopback/rest package and REST transport in general stale
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants