You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The naming scheme of binding moad is to associate any residue name appearing on a line to a increasing res number, for each chain (for instance 1cqf--> BGC GAL GLA F:1 G:1 I:1 ..) will look for ligand1=(BGC F 1, GAL F 2, GLA F 3), ligand2 =(BGC G 1, GAL G 2, GLA G 3), ligand2 =(BGC I 1, GAL I 2, GLA I 3) ecc..
So far, the strategy used to overcome mismatches is to skip progressively in order (from the MOAD naming scheme) the name-chainID-ResNumber. This works most of times but not always. An example is 4z0u.pdb where the pdb skips the first 4 names and start from the 5th but keeping to index of the number at the beginning (usually everything is shifted accordingly).
In general, one could device more flexible strategies to overcome mismatches
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The naming scheme of binding moad is to associate any residue name appearing on a line to a increasing res number, for each chain (for instance 1cqf--> BGC GAL GLA F:1 G:1 I:1 ..) will look for ligand1=(BGC F 1, GAL F 2, GLA F 3), ligand2 =(BGC G 1, GAL G 2, GLA G 3), ligand2 =(BGC I 1, GAL I 2, GLA I 3) ecc..
So far, the strategy used to overcome mismatches is to skip progressively in order (from the MOAD naming scheme) the name-chainID-ResNumber. This works most of times but not always. An example is 4z0u.pdb where the pdb skips the first 4 names and start from the 5th but keeping to index of the number at the beginning (usually everything is shifted accordingly).
In general, one could device more flexible strategies to overcome mismatches
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: