We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
thx @lukeed , i like this repo. maybe we should support blob, but it's uneasy for test. if you accept it, i will make a pr. if (str === '[object Blob]') return x.slice(); #8 Originally posted by @tooss367 in #8 (comment)
thx @lukeed , i like this repo. maybe we should support blob, but it's uneasy for test. if you accept it, i will make a pr. if (str === '[object Blob]') return x.slice();
thx @lukeed , i like this repo. maybe we should support blob, but it's uneasy for test. if you accept it, i will make a pr.
if (str === '[object Blob]') return x.slice();
#8
Originally posted by @tooss367 in #8 (comment)
Originally posted by @tooss367 in #27 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
if (str === '[object Blob]') return x.slice
maybe we should support blob, but it's uneasy for test. if you accept it, i will make a pr. if (str === '[object Blob]') return x.slice(); #8 Originally posted by @tooss367 in #8 (comment) Originally posted by @tooss367 in #27 (comment)
maybe we should support blob, but it's uneasy for test. if you accept it, i will make a pr. if (str === '[object Blob]') return x.slice(); #8 Originally posted by @tooss367 in #8 (comment)
maybe we should support blob, but it's uneasy for test. if you accept it, i will make a pr. if (str === '[object Blob]') return x.slice();
maybe we should support blob, but it's uneasy for test. if you accept it, i will make a pr.
#8 Originally posted by @tooss367 in #8 (comment)
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Originally posted by @tooss367 in #27 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: