-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 207
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
LazyLoad extraClass changed place #2041
Comments
@TheMaaarc does it have something to do with the overhaul? |
@JohnnyMcWeed Can you rewrite your code to work with the new extraClass position? If not, do you have an example of what doesn't work for you anymore? I'd say I'll add the extraClass position change to the changelog / upgrade files @nadar?
|
👍 perfect |
@TheMaaarc I had some images which all changed the appearance though they had different bootstrap classes on it... E. g. one of it was a square before any not it's rectangular due to the absolute position of the image and the class changes |
So it seems we have produced a serious BC break. Any suggestions to fix that with a patch release - without to change code? |
Thanks @TheMaaarc seems to be working again :)
|
Interesting aswell: Seems that with e. g. bootstrap 4's |
@JohnnyMcWeed Hmmm - I did test the I will take a look at the fixed-top issue and create a new issue if necessary. Thanks for reporting! |
@JohnnyMcWeed I just checked your code example again. There should be a Can you show me the source code instead of the compiled one? |
Alright, must have been related to this, thanks. My fault, sorry :) |
@JohnnyMcWeed Good that it works. 👍 |
Yes indeed, just wanted to tell it as I changed it quickly and saw it :) |
What steps will reproduce the problem?
Use latest version and LazyLoad
What is the expected result?
extraClass
is still added to the image, as in the class descriptionWhat do you get instead?
The output for the LazyLoad-Widget changed: extraClass seems to be added to the wrapper instead.
Further
'attributesOnly' => true,
didn't seem to work as well... Should I open another issue?Additional infos
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: