You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for developing and open-sourcing this operator! Maintaining Flink jobs with state on Kubernetes without it has been error prone. Quick question: I'd also like to use this operator for Flink jobs without a persistent state requirement. Is it possible to deploy a new version of a job without restoring from a savepoint when state doesn't matter?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Today, the operator only supports updates to an application by taking a savepoint. We will need to make some changes to the state machine in the operator to support updates without savepoint - something like SavepointInfo - Disabled.
Until we implement that, the only alternate option is to delete the application resource (with deleteMode set to None) and create a new one.
Adding my +1 here. We have a number of medium-sized (6M+ records/sec) jobs that are stateless due to idempotency that we'd like to migrate over to FlinkK8sOperator. Cross-linking this issue from an internal backlog as we may help implement it ourselves out of need.
Thank you for developing and open-sourcing this operator! Maintaining Flink jobs with state on Kubernetes without it has been error prone. Quick question: I'd also like to use this operator for Flink jobs without a persistent state requirement. Is it possible to deploy a new version of a job without restoring from a savepoint when state doesn't matter?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: