Safenode numbering does not lend itself to easy display and sorting

[willief]

The existing convention of numbering nodes from safenode1 up does not lend itself to optimal display and sorting.
Consider using a three digit node identifier with leading zeroes from safenode001 up to allow more convenient display and sorting.

[willief]

This will obviously limit us to <999 nodes per machine. As it stands, that is not an issue. A further digit could be added to future-proof this but current thinking is for relatively small numbers of nodes per machine so this is a far out edge case.