Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Import admin_level=8 #1

Open
ialokim opened this issue Feb 28, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

Import admin_level=8 #1

ialokim opened this issue Feb 28, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@ialokim
Copy link
Member

ialokim commented Feb 28, 2018

In order to enable navitia.io in our ni coverage to add place values (so e.g. add "Managua" to all stops inside Managua), it needs administrative boundaries with admin_level=8.

Up to now there are none in Nicaragua (see here), but it's pretty the same information provided by settlements.

We should probably give this "little" import a high priority. What do you think @xamanu @AltNico @roirobo @porfiriopaiz ?

@pantierra
Copy link
Member

Yes, this is great. As a starting point I would like to mention this input:

@ialokim
Copy link
Member Author

ialokim commented Feb 5, 2019

I've been looking into the city_polygons_wgs84.shp dataset which should contain the administrative boundaries for admin_level=8 and noticed that the data seems quite outdated as nearly all of the cities already seem to be bigger than the shapefile states. See the two examples for Estelí and Managua:

osm-import1
osm-import2

So I fear at least the information provided by this dataset is not very useful (anymore) for an import into OSM.

@xamanu How did you get this data? Could they have newer versions which they could provide us too?

@ialokim
Copy link
Member Author

ialokim commented Feb 6, 2019

They even seem to provide the contours the cities had back in 1988, see for example Estelí as provided by INETER.

So pretty sure this data will not be helpful for inclusion in OSM, but I am wondering if it is a good idea to just manually add city contours following the current extend (and not backed up by any official data source)?

@AltNico
Copy link

AltNico commented Feb 6, 2019

@ialokim

I am wondering if it is a good idea to just manually add city contours following the current extend (and not backed up by any official data source)?

👍 for this. I think it's better to have at least some data than to have no data.

@roirobo
Copy link
Member

roirobo commented Feb 6, 2019

So pretty sure this data will not be helpful for inclusion in OSM, but I am wondering if it is a good idea to just manually add city contours following the current extend (and not backed up by any official data source)?

The problem is that neither the current extend is updated. But is the closest we can get so far.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants