Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The sky attribute of MapLibre Style Spec may be invalid #685

Closed
gisxuh opened this issue May 29, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #686
Closed

The sky attribute of MapLibre Style Spec may be invalid #685

gisxuh opened this issue May 29, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #686
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@gisxuh
Copy link

gisxuh commented May 29, 2024

In MapLibre Style Spec, there is a sky attribute that appears to be valid, but it is invalid in custom style.json. But in this website( https://wifidb.net/demo/sky/terrain.html#6/47.265/11.404/0/60 )There is a demo that uses a version of maplibre-gl-dev. js called v4.0.0 pre. 6, which is indeed effective. I compared this demo with the same version of code on the official website and made many modifications to achieve the sky effect. My native language is not English, and I hope community experts can understand what I am saying. Thank you for your efforts!

@HarelM
Copy link
Collaborator

HarelM commented May 29, 2024

Sky is still experimental and wasn't really released in any official version.
I thought the docs stated that, but apparently they don't.
I'll take care of it.

@HarelM HarelM transferred this issue from maplibre/awesome-maplibre May 29, 2024
@gisxuh gisxuh closed this as completed May 30, 2024
@HarelM HarelM reopened this May 30, 2024
@HarelM HarelM added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label May 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants