You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi there!
I was reviewing the soilgrids indicators. The function documentation refers to the 2017 PLOS One paper, which corresponds to a ~60% accuracy. The new generation of SoilGrids displays an accuracy > 90% and there is a corresponding publication in the SOIL journal.
Is it possible to ensure that the mapme.biodiversity packages fetches its data from the 2.0 version of SoilGrid, and refer to the 2021 paper, that includes an updated information?
Best regards,
FB
PS : there is a typo at the beginning of the function documentation: it should read "each parameter is mapped" (currently it reads "each parapeters is mapped")
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi there,
I understand too that it refers to the 2.0 version to soilgrids. Then my suggestion would be to update the "reference" section of the soilgrids function documentation to point to the SOIL paper instead of the PLOS ONE paper.
Hi there!
I was reviewing the soilgrids indicators. The function documentation refers to the 2017 PLOS One paper, which corresponds to a ~60% accuracy. The new generation of SoilGrids displays an accuracy > 90% and there is a corresponding publication in the SOIL journal.
Is it possible to ensure that the mapme.biodiversity packages fetches its data from the 2.0 version of SoilGrid, and refer to the 2021 paper, that includes an updated information?
Best regards,
FB
PS : there is a typo at the beginning of the function documentation: it should read "each parameter is mapped" (currently it reads "each parapeters is mapped")
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: