You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I thinks the advantage of LEST is that there is no need to compile a lib/dll before using it (compared to gtest, boost.test etc). But the google mock gives an elegant way to implement stubs for testers. Can you add mock feature into the next version?
Another project that implements UT and mock is http://cpputest.github.com. But this project also need to pre-buid a lib/dll before using it. This would make trouble when a project has to support various compilers/os. (e.g., I have found that a gtest lib compiled from VS2010 was not supported by VS2013)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
hysci
changed the title
Suggestion: Can you implement mock feature based on this framework
New Feature: Can you implement mock feature based on this framework
Jan 24, 2016
hysci
changed the title
New Feature: Can you implement mock feature based on this framework
New Feature: Can you implement moc based on this framework
Jan 24, 2016
hysci
changed the title
New Feature: Can you implement moc based on this framework
New Feature: Can you implement mock based on this framework
Jan 24, 2016
I thinks the advantage of LEST is that there is no need to compile a lib/dll before using it (compared to gtest, boost.test etc). But the google mock gives an elegant way to implement stubs for testers. Can you add mock feature into the next version?
Another project that implements UT and mock is http://cpputest.github.com. But this project also need to pre-buid a lib/dll before using it. This would make trouble when a project has to support various compilers/os. (e.g., I have found that a gtest lib compiled from VS2010 was not supported by VS2013)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: