Disallow /batch_send usage in a room where the room version doesn't support it or is not the room creator

[sumnerevans]

Description

Currently, we just don't persist the insertion, batch, and marker events but we shouldn't allow the /batch_send usage in the first place to make it more obvious.

Steps to reproduce

I created a test case here that reproduces this issue 100% of the time. It's a near copy-paste of another one of the batch send test cases, but with different assertion logic.

Homeserver

Branch based off of 0c95313

Synapse Version

{"server_version":"1.61.0 (b=develop,f33356e8f8)","python_version":"3.10.4"}

Installation Method

No response

Platform

NixOS. Running in Python virtualenv.

Relevant log output

$ trial tests.rest.client.test_room_batch
tests.rest.client.test_room_batch
  RoomBatchTestCase
    test_room_batch_event_id_persistence ...                             [FAIL]
    test_same_state_groups_for_whole_historical_batch ...                  [OK]
    test_sync_while_batch_importing ...                                    [OK]

===============================================================================
[FAIL]
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/sumner/projects/beeper/synapse/tests/rest/client/test_room_batch.py", line 337, in test_room_batch_event_id_persistence
    self.assertEqual(
  File "/home/sumner/projects/beeper/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/twisted/trial/_synctest.py", line 422, in assertEqual
    super().assertEqual(first, second, msg)
  File "/nix/store/40n9pd613v8fc3x39yjrgs1i7d4q8yl0-python3-3.10.4/lib/python3.10/unittest/case.py", line 845, in assertEqual
    assertion_func(first, second, msg=msg)
  File "/nix/store/40n9pd613v8fc3x39yjrgs1i7d4q8yl0-python3-3.10.4/lib/python3.10/unittest/case.py", line 838, in _baseAssertEqual
    raise self.failureException(msg)
twisted.trial.unittest.FailTest: None != '$YtSa2mJ7KNSHoiLf7tf63Jn7rOnxmezUts1gaE-pKFk'

tests.rest.client.test_room_batch.RoomBatchTestCase.test_room_batch_event_id_persistence
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 3 tests in 2.834s

FAILED (failures=1, successes=2)

Anything else that would be useful to know?

No response