Downstream processing of ATAC data, including QC's and differential accessibility. Starting point are deduplicated bam files, could be obtained from snakePipes (https://github.com/maxplanck-ie/snakepipes).
All samples in a 'run' have to belong to the same group. That means that out of all peaks/sample, a union will be made.
Fasta headers un field 0 (space delimited) are not allowed to contain a pipe character '|'.
set up the environment:
git clone git@github.com:maxplanck-ie/ATACofthesnake.git
cd ATACofthesnake
conda env create -f env.yml -n aos
conda activate aos
pip install ./
ATAC -h
standard analysis:
ATAC --bamdir folder/with/bamfiles/ --outputdir outputfolder
--gtf genes.gtf --genomefasta genome.fa
--snakemakeprofile profile -b read_attracting_regions.bed
Note that this pipeline depends on snakemake, and forces you to have a snakemake profile. The default analysis will generate:
- sieved bamfiles. (cfr. --fragsize/-f & --read_attracting_regions/-b). Note that read attracting regions are obliged. At minimum this should contain the mitochondrial genome. Note that the mitochondrial contig is assumed to be named 'MT'. You can change this using --mitostring.
- peaks called per bamfile (under peaks/) and a union of all peaks (peakset/).
- bigwigs normalized using scalefactors and RPKM.
- a number of QC plots (figures/) and metrics (qc/)
Differential analysis requires the additional yaml file specifying the comparison (comparison.yaml) and the samplesheet.
ATAC --bamdir folder/with/bamfiles/ --outputdir outputfolder
--gtf genes.gtf --genomefasta genome.fa --genomesize 1.87e9
--snakemakeprofile profile -b read_attracting_regions.bed
--comparison comparison.yaml --samplesheet samplesheet.tsv
The samplesheet has to be a tab-separated file with the first column containing the sample names (as the bam files are named), and the other columns containing the factors that will make up the design. For example:
sample | genotype | treatment |
---|---|---|
sample1 | WT | DMSO |
sample2 | WT | DMSO |
sample3 | WT | drug |
sample4 | WT | drug |
sample5 | KO | DMSO |
sample6 | KO | DMSO |
sample7 | KO | drug |
sample8 | KO | drug |
will result in the following design:
~ genoype + treatment
or if --interaction is set:
~ genotype * treatment
Note the comparisons made need to be specified in the comparison.yaml file, a samplesheet alone is not enough. An example together with the above samplesheet would be:
comparison1:
group1:
genotype: 'WT'
group2:
genotype: 'KO'
wtdmso_vs_wtdrug:
wtdmso:
genotype: 'WT'
treatment: 'DMSO'
wtdrug:
genotype: 'WT'
treatment: 'drug'
In this case, 2 analyses would be performed (under folders 'comparison1' & 'wtdmso_vs_wtdrug'). In both cases all of the factor columns in the samplesheet will be used in the design.
A motif file in meme format can be supplied as well. If this is the case, the motifs will first be clustered, and motif enrichments will be calculated for all differential regions (using ame). Note that the 'reciprocal' differential peaks will be used as background. E.g. group2 differential peaks are background for group1 enrichments and vice versa. Note that this approach could be biased if there is a strong disbalance between those groups.