Thank you for your interest in contributing to tendermint-rs! The goal of tendermint-rs is to provide a high quality, formally verified interface to Tendermint.
This document outlines the best practices for contributing to this repository:
- Proposing Changes - process for agreeing to changes
- Forking - fork the repo to make pull requests
- Changelog - changes must be recorded in the changelog
- Pull Requests - what makes a good pull request
- Releases - how our release process looks
When contributing to the project, adhering to the following guidelines will dramatically increase the likelihood of changes being accepted quickly.
- A good place to start is to search through the existing issues for the problem you're encountering.
- If no relevant issues exist, submit one describing the problem you're facing, as well as a definition of done. A definition of done, which tells us how to know when the issue can be closed, helps us to scope the problem and give it definite boundaries. Without a definition of done, issues can become vague, amorphous changesets that never really come to a satisfactory conclusion.
- Once the issue exists, assign yourself to it. If there's already someone assigned to the issue, comment on the issue to ask if you can take it over, or reach out directly to the current assignee.
We consider a PR to be "small" if it's under 100 lines' worth of meaningful code changes, but we will accommodate PRs of up to about 300 lines. Only in exceptional circumstances will we review larger PRs.
Keeping PRs small helps reduce maintainers' workloads, increases speed of getting feedback, and prevents PRs from standing open for long periods of time. If you need to make bigger changes, it's recommended that you plan out your changes in smaller, more manageable chunks (e.g. one issue may take several PRs to address).
If your proposed changes are large, complex, or involve substantial changes to the architecture of one or more components, a maintainer may ask that you first submit an ADR (architecture decision record) before you start coding your solution.
ADRs are a way for us to keep track of why we've made specific architectural changes over time. This is intended to help newcomers to the codebase understand our current architecture and how it has evolved, as well as to help us not repeat past mistakes.
If you need help with developing an ADR, feel free to ask us.
If you do not have write access to the repository, your contribution should be made through a fork on GitHub. Fork the repository, contribute to your fork, and make a pull request back upstream.
When forking, add your fork's URL as a new git remote in your local copy of the repo. For instance, to create a fork and work on a branch of it:
- Create the fork on GitHub, using the fork button.
cd
to the original clone of the repo on your machinegit remote rename origin upstream
git remote add origin git@github.com:<location of fork>
Now origin
refers to your fork and upstream
refers to this version.
git push -u origin master
to update the fork, and make pull requests against
this repo.
To pull in updates from the origin repo, run
git fetch upstream
git rebase upstream/master
(or whatever branch you want)
Every non-trivial PR must update the CHANGELOG.md. This is accomplished
indirectly by adding entries to the .changelog
folder in unclog
format. CHANGELOG.md
will be built by whomever is responsible for performing a
release just prior to release - this is to avoid changelog conflicts prior to
releases.
The Changelog is not a record of which pull requests were merged; the commit history already shows that. The Changelog is a notice to the user about how their expectations of the software should be modified. It is part of the UX of a release and is a critical user facing integration point. The Changelog must be clean, inviting, and readable, with concise, meaningful entries. Entries must be semantically meaningful to users. If a change takes multiple Pull Requests to complete, it should likely have only a single entry in the Changelog describing the net effect to the user.
When writing Changelog entries, ensure they are targeting users of the software, not fellow developers. Developers have much more context and care about more things than users do. Changelogs are for users.
Changelog structure is modeled after Tendermint Core and Hashicorp Consul. See those changelogs for examples.
Changes for a given release should be split between the five sections: Security, Breaking Changes, Features, Improvements, Bug Fixes.
Changelog entries should be formatted as follows:
- `[pkg]` A description of the change with *users* in mind
([#xxx](https://github.com/informalsystems/tendermint-rs/issues/xxx))
Here, pkg
is the part of the code that changed, and xxx
is the issue or
pull request number.
Changelog entries should be ordered alphabetically according to the pkg
, and
numerically according to the issue/pull-request number.
Changes with multiple classifications should be doubly included (eg. a bug fix that is also a breaking change should be recorded under both).
Breaking changes are further subdivided according to the APIs/users they impact. Any change that effects multiple APIs/users should be recorded multiply - for instance, a change to some core protocol data structure might need to be reflected both as breaking the core protocol but also breaking any APIs where core data structures are exposed.
Pull requests are squash-merged into one of the following primary development branches:
master
- targeting compatibility with the latest official release of Tendermint.- tendermint-rs version-specific branches, e.g.
v0.23.x
- targeting patches to older versions of tendermint-rs.
Indicate in your pull request which version of Tendermint/tendermint-rs you are targeting with your changes. Changes to multiple versions will require separate PRs. See the README for the version support matrix.
Branch names should be prefixed with the author, eg. name/feature-x
.
PRs must:
- make reference to an issue outlining the context.
- update any relevant documentation and include tests.
- update the changelog with a description of the change
Commits should be concise but informative, and moderately clean. Commits will be squashed into a single commit for the PR with all the commit messages.
When the problem as well as proposed solution are well understood, changes should start with a draft pull request against master. The draft signals that work is underway. When the work is ready for feedback, hitting "Ready for Review" will signal to the maintainers to take a look. Maintainers will not review draft PRs.
Our release process is as follows:
- Update the changelog to reflect and summarize all changes in
the release. This involves:
- Running
unclog release vX.Y.Z
to create a summary of all of the changes in this release. - Running
unclog build > CHANGELOG.md
to update the changelog. - Committing this updated
CHANGELOG.md
file to the repo.
- Running
- Push this to a branch
release/vX.Y.Z
according to the version number of the anticipated release (e.g.release/v0.17.0
) and open a draft PR. - Bump all relevant versions in the codebase to the new version and push these
changes to the release PR. This includes:
- All
Cargo.toml
files (making sure dependencies' versions are updated too). - All crates'
lib.rs
files documentation references'html_root_url
parameters must point to the new version.
- All
- Run
cargo doc --all-features --open
locally to double-check that all the documentation compiles and seems up-to-date and coherent. Fix any potential issues here and push them to the release PR. - Mark the PR as Ready for Review and incorporate feedback on the release.
- Once approved, run the
release.sh
script. Fix any problems that may arise during this process and push the changes to the release PR. This step requires the appropriate privileges to push crates to crates.io. - Once all crates have been successfully released, merge the PR to
master
and tag the repo at the new version (e.g.v0.17.0
).