Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve template of command service gen doc #270

Closed
NicolasMahe opened this issue Jul 4, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Improve template of command service gen doc #270

NicolasMahe opened this issue Jul 4, 2018 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers
Milestone

Comments

@NicolasMahe
Copy link
Member

The template of the command service gen-doc does not include the keys name.

The result should be something very similar to the excellent README of this repo: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mesg-foundation/service-ethereum-erc20/master/README.md

Related to #258 and #267.

@NicolasMahe NicolasMahe added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 4, 2018
@NicolasMahe NicolasMahe self-assigned this Jul 4, 2018
@NicolasMahe
Copy link
Member Author

Don't forget optional inputs!

@NicolasMahe NicolasMahe added this to the v1.1.0 milestone Jul 17, 2018
@NicolasMahe NicolasMahe added good first issue Good for newcomers and removed beginner labels Aug 7, 2018
@NicolasMahe NicolasMahe modified the milestones: v1.1.0, v1.2.0 Aug 13, 2018
@NicolasMahe
Copy link
Member Author

Needs to wait to have the new Event, Task, Output type in order to add functions Name to each of the type.

@antho1404 antho1404 removed this from the v1.2.0 milestone Sep 5, 2018
@NicolasMahe NicolasMahe added this to the v0.5.0 milestone Nov 27, 2018
@ilgooz
Copy link
Contributor

ilgooz commented Nov 27, 2018

  • lets also generate "Table of Contents"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants