BIPM Feedback: French page 36, sectio 5.4.2, last side note: spaces not correct, compare with original

[ronaldtse]

This is to do with math formula variables spacing inside side notes. Notice in the sidebar the variables seem to be spaced out ("justified" spacing?).

i.e. these seem to be spaced out

• "U_max"
• "V_max"
• "W(Cu)"

Original:

Generated:

Originally reported in #41 .

[Intelligent2013]

I've just rendered PDF in my environment:

max after U and V looks ok, but W(Cu) looks with spaces.

jEuclid doesn't use justification.

Original source mathml:

<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
	<mi>w</mi>
	<mfenced open="(" close=")">
		<mrow>
			<mtext>Cu</mtext>
		</mrow>
	</mfenced>
	<mo>=</mo>
	<mn>1,3</mn>
	<mo>×</mo>
	<msup>
		<mrow>
			<mn>10</mn>
		</mrow>
		<mrow>
			<mrow>
				<mo>−</mo>
				<mn>6</mn>
			</mrow>
		</mrow>
	</msup>
</math>

jEuclid renders as:

If we move mfenced open="(" close=")" into nested mtext, i.e.:

<mrow>
	<mtext>(Cu)</mtext>
</mrow>

then we get a bit compact view:

Looks like jEuclid adds some space for mfenced.

In any case isn't looks as original (there isn't distance between w and (:

In the original docx, this equation typed as normal text (not Equation object in Word). If we insert it as Equation, then we get the distance between w and (:

My proposal - move mfenced attributes into nested element in xslt on-fly.

[ronaldtse]

I think the concern is about "Vmax" looking like "V m a x". The space between the parentheses is acceptable. Thanks!

[Intelligent2013]

BIPM xslt updated for decreasing space between ( and ).
It affects on these equations: si-brochure-fr.presentation.mathml.pdf

[ronaldtse]

Thank you @Intelligent2013 ! Can we close this now?

[Intelligent2013]

Done.

[ronaldtse]

Need confirmation. In the latest provided si-brochure-fr.presentation.mathml.pdf file, line 226 is this:

BIPM pointed out that:

There is still an error in item 226: the index ‘12’ before the C for carbon, should be a superscript, not a subscript: 12C.

But it is encoded correctly in source

[stem%unnumbered]
++++
ii(M)("X") = ii(A)_"r" ("X") [ii(M)(""^{12}"C")//12] = ii(A)_"r" ("X") ii(M)_{rm(u)}
++++

And also rendered correctly in the currently released version:

@Intelligent2013 could you help confirm the latest stylesheet is correct? Thanks!

[Intelligent2013]

Yes, the latest stylesheet (in mn-native-pdf/xslt_src) is correct and renders so:

si-brochure-fr.presentation.mathml.pdf shows only difference between source mathml markup and mfenced processing, but not all another mathml markup as preceding superscript, superscript one-level alignment, etc.)

[ronaldtse]

Thank you!