You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At the time we introduced the concept of non-LTS versions, it made more sense. Time between LTS releases was longer and not a fixed time apart. We also didn't do milestone releases after 1.0 GA. I'm not so sure we need non-LTS anymore or how it would fit with our more regular time-based release cadence now. We are now committing to releasing an LTS version every 6 months, and milestone versions in between there for early testing of the LTS version. What effect a non-LTS version would have on version numbers and when it would even make sense to release a non-LTS version are unclear to me now.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
At the time we introduced the concept of non-LTS versions, it made more sense. Time between LTS releases was longer and not a fixed time apart. We also didn't do milestone releases after 1.0 GA. I'm not so sure we need non-LTS anymore or how it would fit with our more regular time-based release cadence now. We are now committing to releasing an LTS version every 6 months, and milestone versions in between there for early testing of the LTS version. What effect a non-LTS version would have on version numbers and when it would even make sense to release a non-LTS version are unclear to me now.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: