-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 113
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Managing Dependencies to different Versions of the same App #1060
Comments
Sorry for the delay |
I will do some more experimenting to see whether we can isolate any configuration that works. If they were merged together (i.e., from the org level and the repo level), how would I see that? In the logs? |
Question: is an appDependencyProbingPaths setting at the repo level supposed to override one at the org level? |
I think that currently, they will be added together (as all arrays in settings) |
Ah. So that would result in a single array of repositories, all of which would be searched. That would make sense. In the meantime, I find that we might be able to eliminate this requirement altogether by bringing these two outlier extension apps up to the current version of our base app. I say we can close this issue for now; thanks for the clarification--now we know how that works. |
We have a base application on which several client extension apps depend. For now, we have to maintain two versions of this base app--same app id, different code base. We have one of the base app repos named in appDependencyProbingPaths, at the Org Settings level (ALGOORGSETTINGS). We have client extenstions that depend on both versions. When setting up a repo for a client extension that depends on the second base version, I have tried using installApps and appDependencyProbingPaths to point to either the app or the repo, respectively, for the second version of the base app. no joy--we get missing symbol errors either way. What would be the best way to set this up, so that some client versions can refer to one version of the base app, and others to the second version?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: