Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestion Backlog Slog, 10/8/2018 #27619

Closed
RyanCavanaugh opened this issue Oct 8, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

Suggestion Backlog Slog, 10/8/2018 #27619

RyanCavanaugh opened this issue Oct 8, 2018 · 4 comments
Labels
Design Notes Notes from our design meetings

Comments

@RyanCavanaugh
Copy link
Member

@RyanCavanaugh RyanCavanaugh added the Design Notes Notes from our design meetings label Oct 8, 2018
@RyanCavanaugh
Copy link
Member Author

@jack-williams
Copy link
Collaborator

Re: #27118

Should test if check type is identical, not subtype

Has the team looked at the impact of switching from bivariance to invariance? I don't really have an intuition for what is used in RWC, but I could imagine something like Exclude<A, null> <: Exclude<B, null> if A <: B being useful.

@inoyakaigor
Copy link

#14094 ^ type operator
New mapped types workarounds seem good enough

Is it mean what ^ operator will not be added?

@mattmccutchen
Copy link
Contributor

@jack-williams Let's take the discussion of #27118 to that issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Design Notes Notes from our design meetings
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants