You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I created listener to listen on LLA fe80::7260:3b3d:bd2b:c845%6 and I open connection to it from same host.
On Windows local & remote addresses are correct and have scope as expected.
Client [fe80::7260:3b3d:bd2b:c845%6]:65289 [fe80::7260:3b3d:bd2b:c845%6]:65288
Server [fe80::7260:3b3d:bd2b:c845%6]:65288 [fe80::7260:3b3d:bd2b:c845%6]:65289
Interestingly, in some cases scope is set for addresses other than LLA.
Connecting to ::1 on Linux and Windows
Server [::1%1]:41741 [::1]:50859
Server [::1%1]:65292 [::1]:65293
loopback address has scope set even if it should not.
In all cases so far the connection succeeded but it makes it difficult for companions and I'm. to sure (yet) about multi-machine setup where the scope is essential for selecting correct interface.
Affected OS
Windows
Linux
macOS
Other (specify below)
Additional OS information
No response
MsQuic version
main
Steps taken to reproduce bug
make simple listener and connect to it using LLA.
observe addresses on established connection on both client & server.
Expected behavior
LLA should always have scope set, global addresses should not have scope set.
Windows and Linux would have same outcome for same scenario.
Local and remote address on client and server should be exactly opposite.
But there should not be differences in scope.
Actual outcome
scope is missing in some cases on Linux. It can be incorrectly set for global addresses.
Additional details
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the bug
I created listener to listen on LLA
fe80::7260:3b3d:bd2b:c845%6
and I open connection to it from same host.On Windows local & remote addresses are correct and have scope as expected.
Same test on Linux:
Client is missing scopeID.
Interestingly, in some cases scope is set for addresses other than LLA.
Connecting to
::1
on Linux and Windowsloopback address has scope set even if it should not.
In all cases so far the connection succeeded but it makes it difficult for companions and I'm. to sure (yet) about multi-machine setup where the scope is essential for selecting correct interface.
Affected OS
Additional OS information
No response
MsQuic version
main
Steps taken to reproduce bug
make simple listener and connect to it using LLA.
observe addresses on established connection on both client & server.
Expected behavior
LLA should always have scope set, global addresses should not have scope set.
Windows and Linux would have same outcome for same scenario.
Local and remote address on client and server should be exactly opposite.
But there should not be differences in scope.
Actual outcome
scope is missing in some cases on Linux. It can be incorrectly set for global addresses.
Additional details
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: