-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 268
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add build definition auth #17
Merged
EliiseS
merged 38 commits into
microsoft:master
from
EliiseS:es/add-build-definition-resource-auth
Jul 17, 2020
Merged
Add build definition auth #17
EliiseS
merged 38 commits into
microsoft:master
from
EliiseS:es/add-build-definition-resource-auth
Jul 17, 2020
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ghost
added
the
size/L
label
Jun 26, 2020
tmeckel
reviewed
Jun 30, 2020
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've fixed the linting errors in my PR #18 already
tmeckel
reviewed
Jun 30, 2020
tmeckel
suggested changes
Jun 30, 2020
azuredevops/internal/service/build/resource_resource_authorization.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
ghost
added
the
documentation
label
Jul 9, 2020
tmeckel
suggested changes
Jul 15, 2020
azuredevops/internal/service/build/resource_resource_authorization.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
azuredevops/internal/service/build/resource_resource_authorization.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
xuzhang3
reviewed
Jul 16, 2020
xuzhang3
reviewed
Jul 16, 2020
xuzhang3
reviewed
Jul 16, 2020
xuzhang3
reviewed
Jul 16, 2020
xuzhang3
reviewed
Jul 16, 2020
xuzhang3
reviewed
Jul 16, 2020
azuredevops/internal/service/build/resource_resource_authorization.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
xuzhang3
reviewed
Jul 16, 2020
azuredevops/internal/service/build/resource_resource_authorization.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
xuzhang3
reviewed
Jul 16, 2020
xuzhang3
requested changes
Jul 16, 2020
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@EliiseS This PR is great. I left some comments, :D
EliiseS
force-pushed
the
es/add-build-definition-resource-auth
branch
from
July 16, 2020 18:12
330b3f1
to
9cc7d59
Compare
tmeckel
suggested changes
Jul 16, 2020
azuredevops/internal/service/build/resource_resource_authorization.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
xuzhang3
reviewed
Jul 17, 2020
Co-authored-by: xuzhang3 <57888764+xuzhang3@users.noreply.github.com>
tmeckel
suggested changes
Jul 17, 2020
…b.com/EliiseS/terraform-provider-azuredevops into es/add-build-definition-resource-auth
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
All Submissions:
What about the current behavior has changed?
Add support to authorize resources for a build
Issue Numbers:
Does this introduce a change to
go.mod
,go.sum
orvendor/
?Does this introduce a breaking change?