Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] process monitor does not support multi-byte characters #121

Open
profnandaa opened this issue Feb 27, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

[BUG] process monitor does not support multi-byte characters #121

profnandaa opened this issue Feb 27, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working work-around

Comments

@profnandaa
Copy link
Member

profnandaa commented Feb 27, 2023

Describe the bug
The current process monitor does not support multi-byte characters, e.g.

2023-02-27 03:50:18 - DEBUG: Unicode character 161:¡''
2023-02-27 03:50:18 - DEBUG: Unicode character 162:'¢'
2023-02-27 03:50:18 - DEBUG: Unicode character 163:'£'
2023-02-27 03:50:18 - DEBUG: Unicode character 164:'¤'
2023-02-27 03:50:18 - DEBUG: Unicode character 165:'Â¥'
2023-02-27 03:50:18 - DEBUG: Unicode character 166:'¦'
2023-02-27 03:50:18 - DEBUG: Unicode character 167:'§'
2023-02-27 03:50:18 - DEBUG: Unicode character 168:'¨'
2023-02-27 03:50:18 - DEBUG: Unicode character 169:'©'
2023-02-27 03:50:18 - DEBUG: Unicode character 170:'ª'
2023-02-27 03:50:18 - DEBUG: Unicode character 171:'«'
2023-02-27 03:50:18 - DEBUG: Unicode character 172:'¬'

Expected behavior
Print out the characters exactly as produced by the process.
em.

Configuration
-Tool: Log Monitor
-Version: 2.0.0-rc

Additional Info
Current work-around in v2/main is to print out - for each byte in place of the character, see PR #122

@profnandaa profnandaa added the bug Something isn't working label Feb 27, 2023
@profnandaa profnandaa self-assigned this Feb 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working work-around
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant