Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Marked for Review Usage #50

Open
basu-a opened this issue Aug 13, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Marked for Review Usage #50

basu-a opened this issue Aug 13, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
discussion enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@basu-a
Copy link

basu-a commented Aug 13, 2020

Hi MIDAS team,

Awesome work making this! I have a quick query on usage/working of the "For review" tab. I see that whenever a file is uploaded, no other user can access it except the user it is uploaded for. After annotating, The overall labelled file can be downloaded, but they cannot approved by on the UI (In the dashboard under projects).

Ideally, an annotation approver needs to go through the transcription/labels, and approve them for multiple transcribers/annotators. Is there a way to have any approver look at the annotation done on audio? Is there a way another user can review the annotations? am I missing something?

@manrajgrover
Copy link
Contributor

@basu-a Thanks for bringing this up!

Currently, our definition of reviewing was that user (who was assigned the audio for annotation) can mark the audio for review so that they can revisit the audio after potential discussion with the team. I understand your usecase which is something we used to do post annotation of the audio. I'm thinking of providing admin permission to view all audios including ones marked for review which should make this easier. Do you have a suggestion for this?

@manrajgrover manrajgrover added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 9, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discussion enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants