You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 22, 2022. It is now read-only.
The validation score (2.0059) is not equal to validation loss (1.01667) or the validation accuracy (0.77713). Similarly, test score is hard to interpret. How are these two scores calculated?
226894.311837 | 2018-04-15 01-09-37 minerva >>> epoch 250 current lr: 0.0003252930814335209
226894.312173 | 2018-04-15 01-09-37 minerva >>> epoch 249 loss: 0.03353
226894.312389 | 2018-04-15 01-09-37 minerva >>> epoch 249 accuracy: 0.99986
226981.769858 | 2018-04-15 01-11-05 minerva >>> epoch 249 validation loss: 1.01667
226981.770167 | 2018-04-15 01-11-05 minerva >>> epoch 249 validation accuracy: 0.77713
227067.955128 | 2018-04-15 01-12-31 minerva >>> training finished...
<...> 227715.884304 | Validation score is 2.0059
227715.884506 | Test score is 2.1295
227715.884696 | That is a solid validation
227715.884888 | Sorry, but this score is not high enough to pass the task
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The validation score (2.0059) is not equal to validation loss (1.01667) or the validation accuracy (0.77713). Similarly, test score is hard to interpret. How are these two scores calculated?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: