Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Choosing the Optimal 3D Planner for UAV Autonomous Exploration in Cluttered Environments #56

Open
amashry opened this issue Mar 3, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@amashry
Copy link

amashry commented Mar 3, 2024

Hi there!
First, thank you for the great work and for opening it up for the community.

I'm currently exploring different UAV 3D planners for use in autonomous exploration in cluttered environments. I've come across several planners like Faster, Mader, FastPlanner (https://github.com/HKUST-Aerial-Robotics/Fast-Planner), FUEL (https://github.com/HKUST-Aerial-Robotics/FUEL), and EGO-Planner or EGO Swarm (https://github.com/ZJU-FAST-Lab/ego-planner-swarm). Each of these has its implementation and approach, yet they share a similar goal in terms of the overall objective.

I'm interested in understanding the key differences between these planners. If you had to choose one for an autonomous exploration task in a cluttered environment, which one would it be and why? Are there other planners, perhaps newer or less known, that you would recommend for such applications?

Additionally, I'm curious about the integration of depth sensing in these systems. RGB-D cameras like the Realsense series are commonly used, but what about the potential of LIDAR or time-of-flight (TOF) sensors for more accurate SLAM? For example, the TOF sensors and their lightweight nature could offer extended flight times, which seems particularly beneficial.

Any insights or recommendations you have would be incredibly helpful!

Thanks a lot!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant