From d7402068f5f5b67a7ffe2acd1f83d33d4100153a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Sebastian=20Markb=C3=A5ge?= Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 22:10:54 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Remove recoverable error when a sync update flows into a dehydrated boundary (#25692) This just removes the error but the underlying issue is still there, and it's likely that the best course of action is to not update in effects and to wrap most updates in startTransition. However, that's more of a performance concern which is not something we generally do even in recoverable errors since they're less actionable and likely belong in another channel. It is also likely that in many cases this happens so rarely because you have to interact quickly enough that it can often be ignored. After changes to other parts of the model, this only happens for sync/discrete updates. There are three scenarios that can happen: - We replace a server rendered fallback with a client rendered fallback. Other than this potentially causing some flickering in the loading state, it's not a big deal. - We replace the server rendered content with a client side fallback if this suspends on the client. This is in line with what would happen anyway. We will loose state of forms which is not intended semantics. State and animations etc would've been lost anyway if it was client-side so that's not a concern. - We replace the server rendered content with a client side rendered tree and lose selection/state and form state. While the content looks the same, which is unfortunate. In most scenarios it's a bad loading state but it's the same scenario as flushing sync client-side. So it's not so bad. The big change here is that we consider this a bug of React that we should fix. Therefore it's not actionable to users today because it should just get fixed. So we're removing the error early. Although anyone that has fixed these issues already are probably better off for it. To fix this while still hydrating we need to be able to rewind a sync tree and then replay it. @tyao1 is going to add a Sync hydration lane. This is will allow us to rewind the tree when we hit this state, and replay it given the previous Context, hydrate and then reapply the update. The reason we didn't do this originally is because it causes sync mode to unwind where as for backwards compatibility we didn't want to cause that breaking semantic - outside Suspense boundaries - and we don't want that semantic longer term. We're only do this as a short term fix. We should also have a way to leave a partial tree in place. If the sync hydration lane suspends, we should be able to switch to a client side fallback without throwing away the state of the DOM and then hydrate later. We now know how we want to fix this longer term. We're going to move all Contexts into resumable trees like what Fizz/Flight does. That way we can leave the original Context at the hydration boundaries and then resume from there. That way the rewinding would never happen even in the existence of a sync hydration lane which would only apply locally to the dehydrated tree. So the steps are 1) remove the error 2) add the sync hydration lane with rewinding 3) Allow hiding server-rendered content while still not hydrated 4) add resumable contexts at these boundaries. Fixes #25625 and #24959. --- ...DOMServerPartialHydration-test.internal.js | 36 ------------------- .../src/ReactFiberBeginWork.new.js | 26 +++++--------- .../src/ReactFiberBeginWork.old.js | 26 +++++--------- 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-) diff --git a/packages/react-dom/src/__tests__/ReactDOMServerPartialHydration-test.internal.js b/packages/react-dom/src/__tests__/ReactDOMServerPartialHydration-test.internal.js index 465ab8de1f190..f2bec4ec6a689 100644 --- a/packages/react-dom/src/__tests__/ReactDOMServerPartialHydration-test.internal.js +++ b/packages/react-dom/src/__tests__/ReactDOMServerPartialHydration-test.internal.js @@ -453,12 +453,6 @@ describe('ReactDOMServerPartialHydration', () => { Scheduler.unstable_flushAll(); jest.runAllTimers(); - expect(Scheduler).toHaveYielded([ - 'This Suspense boundary received an update before it finished ' + - 'hydrating. This caused the boundary to switch to client rendering. ' + - 'The usual way to fix this is to wrap the original update ' + - 'in startTransition.', - ]); expect(hydrated.length).toBe(1); expect(deleted.length).toBe(1); @@ -1102,12 +1096,6 @@ describe('ReactDOMServerPartialHydration', () => { root.render(); Scheduler.unstable_flushAll(); jest.runAllTimers(); - expect(Scheduler).toHaveYielded([ - 'This Suspense boundary received an update before it finished ' + - 'hydrating. This caused the boundary to switch to client ' + - 'rendering. The usual way to fix this is to wrap the original ' + - 'update in startTransition.', - ]); // Flushing now should delete the existing content and show the fallback. @@ -1191,12 +1179,6 @@ describe('ReactDOMServerPartialHydration', () => { // Flushing now should delete the existing content and show the fallback. Scheduler.unstable_flushAll(); jest.runAllTimers(); - expect(Scheduler).toHaveYielded([ - 'This Suspense boundary received an update before it finished ' + - 'hydrating. This caused the boundary to switch to client rendering. ' + - 'The usual way to fix this is to wrap the original update ' + - 'in startTransition.', - ]); expect(container.getElementsByTagName('span').length).toBe(1); expect(ref.current).toBe(span); @@ -1284,12 +1266,6 @@ describe('ReactDOMServerPartialHydration', () => { suspend = false; resolve(); await promise; - expect(Scheduler).toHaveYielded([ - 'This Suspense boundary received an update before it finished ' + - 'hydrating. This caused the boundary to switch to client rendering. ' + - 'The usual way to fix this is to wrap the original update ' + - 'in startTransition.', - ]); Scheduler.unstable_flushAll(); jest.runAllTimers(); @@ -1602,12 +1578,6 @@ describe('ReactDOMServerPartialHydration', () => { // Flushing now should delete the existing content and show the fallback. Scheduler.unstable_flushAll(); jest.runAllTimers(); - expect(Scheduler).toHaveYielded([ - 'This Suspense boundary received an update before it finished ' + - 'hydrating. This caused the boundary to switch to client rendering. ' + - 'The usual way to fix this is to wrap the original update ' + - 'in startTransition.', - ]); expect(container.getElementsByTagName('span').length).toBe(0); expect(ref.current).toBe(null); @@ -2360,12 +2330,6 @@ describe('ReactDOMServerPartialHydration', () => { // This will force all expiration times to flush. Scheduler.unstable_flushAll(); jest.runAllTimers(); - expect(Scheduler).toHaveYielded([ - 'This Suspense boundary received an update before it finished ' + - 'hydrating. This caused the boundary to switch to client rendering. ' + - 'The usual way to fix this is to wrap the original update ' + - 'in startTransition.', - ]); // This will now be a new span because we weren't able to hydrate before const newSpan = container.getElementsByTagName('span')[0]; diff --git a/packages/react-reconciler/src/ReactFiberBeginWork.new.js b/packages/react-reconciler/src/ReactFiberBeginWork.new.js index dc0e80e7edbba..27c086160ffe0 100644 --- a/packages/react-reconciler/src/ReactFiberBeginWork.new.js +++ b/packages/react-reconciler/src/ReactFiberBeginWork.new.js @@ -2717,9 +2717,6 @@ function updateDehydratedSuspenseComponent( current, workInProgress, renderLanes, - // TODO: When we delete legacy mode, we should make this error argument - // required — every concurrent mode path that causes hydration to - // de-opt to client rendering should have an error message. null, ); } @@ -2809,25 +2806,20 @@ function updateDehydratedSuspenseComponent( } } - // If we have scheduled higher pri work above, this will probably just abort the render - // since we now have higher priority work, but in case it doesn't, we need to prepare to - // render something, if we time out. Even if that requires us to delete everything and - // skip hydration. - // Delay having to do this as long as the suspense timeout allows us. + // If we have scheduled higher pri work above, this will just abort the render + // since we now have higher priority work. We'll try to infinitely suspend until + // we yield. TODO: We could probably just force yielding earlier instead. renderDidSuspendDelayIfPossible(); - const capturedValue = createCapturedValue( - new Error( - 'This Suspense boundary received an update before it finished ' + - 'hydrating. This caused the boundary to switch to client rendering. ' + - 'The usual way to fix this is to wrap the original update ' + - 'in startTransition.', - ), - ); + // If we rendered synchronously, we won't yield so have to render something. + // This will cause us to delete any existing content. + // TODO: We should ideally have a sync hydration lane that we can apply to do + // a pass where we hydrate this subtree in place using the previous Context and then + // reapply the update afterwards. return retrySuspenseComponentWithoutHydrating( current, workInProgress, renderLanes, - capturedValue, + null, ); } else if (isSuspenseInstancePending(suspenseInstance)) { // This component is still pending more data from the server, so we can't hydrate its diff --git a/packages/react-reconciler/src/ReactFiberBeginWork.old.js b/packages/react-reconciler/src/ReactFiberBeginWork.old.js index d26036c4553ed..c3fed9d3c46a1 100644 --- a/packages/react-reconciler/src/ReactFiberBeginWork.old.js +++ b/packages/react-reconciler/src/ReactFiberBeginWork.old.js @@ -2717,9 +2717,6 @@ function updateDehydratedSuspenseComponent( current, workInProgress, renderLanes, - // TODO: When we delete legacy mode, we should make this error argument - // required — every concurrent mode path that causes hydration to - // de-opt to client rendering should have an error message. null, ); } @@ -2809,25 +2806,20 @@ function updateDehydratedSuspenseComponent( } } - // If we have scheduled higher pri work above, this will probably just abort the render - // since we now have higher priority work, but in case it doesn't, we need to prepare to - // render something, if we time out. Even if that requires us to delete everything and - // skip hydration. - // Delay having to do this as long as the suspense timeout allows us. + // If we have scheduled higher pri work above, this will just abort the render + // since we now have higher priority work. We'll try to infinitely suspend until + // we yield. TODO: We could probably just force yielding earlier instead. renderDidSuspendDelayIfPossible(); - const capturedValue = createCapturedValue( - new Error( - 'This Suspense boundary received an update before it finished ' + - 'hydrating. This caused the boundary to switch to client rendering. ' + - 'The usual way to fix this is to wrap the original update ' + - 'in startTransition.', - ), - ); + // If we rendered synchronously, we won't yield so have to render something. + // This will cause us to delete any existing content. + // TODO: We should ideally have a sync hydration lane that we can apply to do + // a pass where we hydrate this subtree in place using the previous Context and then + // reapply the update afterwards. return retrySuspenseComponentWithoutHydrating( current, workInProgress, renderLanes, - capturedValue, + null, ); } else if (isSuspenseInstancePending(suspenseInstance)) { // This component is still pending more data from the server, so we can't hydrate its