-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 186
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Question: H2Check.org fails #136
Comments
There's a lot of things that could be going wrong here - do you have a tcpdump of the tests, or at least an error message more helpful than "No support for HTTP/2 was found"? |
@nwgh Hi Nicholas, thanks for taking the time to answer my question. I recorded a session log from Chrome (using the HTTP/2 and SPDY indicator extension @ v0.7.1).
Note: I had to mask the actual API's domain as I can't expose it I can see that it's using the HTTP/2 protocol properly, as expected. I've tested the same on iOS 9, and it works as expected. I'm simply curious as to why the check in the aforementioned website fails. |
Which version of node.js or io.js are you using? |
NodeJs: Latest stable 0.12.7 |
I suspect that h2check.org checks that the server can use ALPN. Node.js 0.12.X cannot use ALPN. @dezinezync you should run the server with io.js and test h2check.org again. The node bug about ALPN support nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#5945 |
I'm aware of that issue, however I did not think the website would use that for running a check. Nonetheless, your reasoning sounds plausible. I'll see if I can get in touch with the author/s of h2check.org and get us a definite answer. I'll also try your suggestion for running it with io.js. Thank you for your time, Tim. |
After multiple attempts, h2check.org does not respond (connection refused on both ports 80 and 443). Closing this until more info comes around. |
Hello,
I have a question: I run the provided server sample code from the
README.md
and when testing it against https://www.h2check.org, it throws the following error:No support for HTTP/2 was found.
Server code:
I checked for the following conditions as well:
But neither of the above returned a positive check. Can someone confirm they see the same validation on their end? If not, and you spot a problem in my setup, could you please point it out?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: