Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(editor): improve nodes panel search #4399

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 24, 2022
Merged

Conversation

mutdmour
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@linear
Copy link

linear bot commented Oct 20, 2022

N8N-4722

@n8n-assistant n8n-assistant bot added n8n team Authored by the n8n team ui Enhancement in /editor-ui or /design-system labels Oct 20, 2022
@mutdmour mutdmour changed the title feat(editor): improve nodes panel sort feat(editor): improve nodes panel search Oct 21, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@MiloradFilipovic MiloradFilipovic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Massive improvement! 🙌
If you really push it, there are still some results favored where I would not expected and it seems bit slower then before but overall works well.

@mutdmour mutdmour merged commit f6733cf into master Oct 24, 2022
@mutdmour mutdmour deleted the n8n-4722-relevance branch October 24, 2022 09:34
@n8n-assistant n8n-assistant bot added the Upcoming Release Will be part of the upcoming release label Oct 24, 2022
@janober
Copy link
Member

janober commented Oct 27, 2022

Got released with n8n@0.200.0

@janober janober removed the Upcoming Release Will be part of the upcoming release label Oct 27, 2022
valya pushed a commit to valya/n8n that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2022
* feat(editor): add relevance sort to nodes panel

* handle locales
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
n8n team Authored by the n8n team ui Enhancement in /editor-ui or /design-system
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants