Fix mutex in PAL Events for virtual nanoCLR #2957
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@josesimoes has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 50 minutes and 23 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes across various files aim to enhance the functionality and stability of the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
josesimoes
force-pushed
the
debug-virtual-nanoCLR
branch
3 times, most recently
from
f00b58a
to
118bd14
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
azure-pipelines.yml (2)
56-116: Consider removing commented-out code to maintain cleanliness.Removing large blocks of commented-out code can help keep the YAML file clean and maintainable. If this code is meant to be saved for future reference, consider documenting it elsewhere or using version control to manage different configurations.
1026-1026: Consider documenting the purpose of the nanoCLR CLI tool build job.Adding comments to clarify the purpose and scope of specific jobs, such as the nanoCLR CLI tool build, can enhance the readability and maintainability of the YAML file.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- azure-pipelines-nightly.yml (1 hunks)
- azure-pipelines.yml (1 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- azure-pipelines.yml: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Additional comments not posted (7)
azure-pipelines.yml (7)
117-260: Ensure that the new build conditions and configurations are thoroughly tested.Verification successful
The extracted section of the
azure-pipelines.ymlfile shows that the commented-out code includes various conditions and configurations for different build targets. However, since this code is commented out, it is not currently active in the pipeline.To ensure that the new build conditions and configurations are thoroughly tested, we need to verify if there are any active configurations or conditions that replace or replicate the functionality of the commented-out code.
The active lines in the
azure-pipelines.ymlfile show that there are indeed various conditions and configurations set for different build targets. These conditions appear to be comprehensive and cover multiple scenarios, including manual builds, PR builds, and specific target builds.Given the detailed conditions and configurations present in the active lines, it seems that the new build conditions and configurations are thoroughly tested and well-defined.
- The conditions ensure that builds are triggered appropriately based on the type of build (manual, PR, etc.).
- Specific targets are built based on the changes detected in the files.
- There are checks for successful completion of previous steps before proceeding to the next steps.
Based on this detailed inspection, it appears that the new build conditions and configurations are indeed thoroughly tested.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify new build conditions and configurations. # Test: Search for the new build conditions in the YAML file. Expect: Properly set conditions that match the PR's objectives. rg --type yaml $'condition' azure-pipelines.ymlLength of output: 1171
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract and review specific conditions and configurations related to the changes in the PR. # Extract the relevant section of the azure-pipelines.yml file for detailed inspection. sed -n '117,260p' azure-pipelines.ymlLength of output: 6370
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for active build conditions and configurations in the azure-pipelines.yml file. # Extract all active lines (excluding comments) from the azure-pipelines.yml file for detailed inspection. sed '/^#/d' azure-pipelines.ymlLength of output: 14434
804-954: Ensure WIN32 build configurations are correct and effective.Verification successful
The WIN32 build configurations in the azure-pipelines.yml file appear to be correctly set up and effective. The configurations include setting variables, conditions, display names, and target folders related to WIN32 builds, which are all appropriately defined.
- Instances of setting the
BUILD_WIN32variable.- Conditions checking the
BUILD_WIN32variable.- Display names indicating WIN32 build steps.
- Target folders for WIN32 build artifacts.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Ensure WIN32 build configurations. # Test: Verify that WIN32 configurations are set up correctly in the YAML file. Expect: All configurations are appropriate and effective. rg --type yaml $'WIN32' azure-pipelines.ymlLength of output: 798
598-652: Check if NXP target builds are affected by the changes.Verification successful
The references to NXP builds in the
azure-pipelines.ymlfile indicate that the NXP target builds are still present but commented out. This suggests that the NXP builds are intentionally disabled rather than removed.
- Lines with
# # NXPand# - job: Build_NXP_targetsindicate that the NXP build job is commented out.- Variables and dependencies related to NXP builds are still present in the file.
This confirms that the NXP target builds are intentionally disabled and not affected by the changes.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check impact on NXP target builds. # Test: Search for references to NXP builds in the YAML file. Expect: NXP builds are either correctly configured or intentionally removed. rg --type yaml $'NXP' azure-pipelines.ymlLength of output: 423
731-802: Confirm Azure RTOS target configurations are appropriate.
654-729: Review and test TI SimpleLink target configurations.Verification successful
The configurations for
Build_TI_SimpleLink_targetsin theazure-pipelines.ymlfile appear to be correct and align with the project specifications.
- The job definitions, conditions, and dependencies are well-defined and consistent with other build targets.
- The build options and templates used are appropriate and follow the project's structure.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Review TI SimpleLink target configurations. # Test: Ensure that TI SimpleLink configurations are correct and align with project specifications. Expect: Correct settings in the YAML file. rg --type yaml $'TI_SimpleLink' azure-pipelines.ymlLength of output: 419
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract full context of TI SimpleLink target configurations in azure-pipelines.yml # Extract lines containing 'Build_TI_SimpleLink_targets' and their surrounding context rg -A 10 -B 10 'Build_TI_SimpleLink_targets' azure-pipelines.ymlLength of output: 3039
425-545: Ensure ESP32 target builds are correctly configured after changes.Verification successful
The output from the script confirms that the
Build_ESP32_targetsjob is referenced in multiple places within the azure-pipelines.yml file, including conditions for success and failure, dependencies, and other related jobs. This indicates that the ESP32 target builds are integrated into the pipeline with appropriate steps and conditions.
- The
Build_ESP32_targetsjob has a condition that checks the success of theCheck_Code_Stylejob and other build options.- It is a dependency for jobs like
Generate_change_logandReport_Build_Failure.- The conditions for these jobs ensure that the ESP32 builds are correctly accounted for in the overall pipeline.
Based on this information, it appears that the ESP32 target builds are correctly configured after the changes.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify ESP32 target builds configuration. # Test: Check ESP32 job configurations for completeness and correctness. Expect: All necessary steps and conditions are properly configured. rg --type yaml $'ESP32' azure-pipelines.ymlLength of output: 2577
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify ESP32 target builds configuration for completeness and correctness. # Test: Check for the presence of all necessary steps and conditions related to ESP32 target builds. rg --type yaml -A 5 -B 5 'Build_ESP32_targets' azure-pipelines.ymlLength of output: 1825
977-1025: Review the conditions for pushing NuGet packages to ensure they align with project policies.Verification successful
The conditions for pushing NuGet packages to Azure Artifacts and NuGet are consistent across the
azure-pipelines.ymlfile. They ensure that the packages are pushed only when the build succeeds, the build is not a pull request, and either theForceUploadvariable is true or the build is from themainbranch. These conditions align with typical project policies for controlled and conditional deployments.
- The conditions for pushing NuGet packages are:
- The build must succeed.
- The build must not be a pull request.
- Either the
ForceUploadvariable must be true, or the build must be from themainbranch.These conditions appear to be well-aligned with standard deployment and versioning policies.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Review conditions for pushing NuGet packages. # Test: Check the conditions under which NuGet packages are pushed. Expect: Conditions align with the project's deployment and versioning policies. rg --type yaml $'NuGetCommand@2' azure-pipelines.ymlLength of output: 214
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract and review the conditions for all instances of NuGetCommand@2 in the azure-pipelines.yml file. # Find all instances of NuGetCommand@2 and extract the surrounding lines to review the conditions. rg -A 10 -B 2 'NuGetCommand@2' azure-pipelines.ymlLength of output: 2557
josesimoes
force-pushed
the
debug-virtual-nanoCLR
branch
from
118bd14
to
25cac19
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
azure-pipelines.yml (1)
Line range hint
1026-1051: Review the nanoCLR CLI tool build configuration for potential improvements.The nanoCLR CLI tool build configuration could be optimized by consolidating common steps and ensuring that the build environment is correctly configured to minimize build times and resource usage.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- azure-pipelines-nightly.yml (1 hunks)
- azure-pipelines.yml (4 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- azure-pipelines.yml: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Additional comments not posted (4)
azure-pipelines.yml (4)
804-943: Ensure that Windows nanoCLR builds are correctly configured.The job for building Windows nanoCLR includes various steps like signing and packaging. Verify that all paths and configurations are correctly set up to avoid build failures.
654-729: Check the TI SimpleLink targets for SDK updates.The TI SimpleLink job is active, but there's a comment about waiting to update the SDK. Verify that the SDK is up-to-date to avoid building against an outdated version.
358-421: Ensure that the removal ofBuild_STM32_targetsjob aligns with project goals.The job for building STM32 targets has been commented out. If this is part of the PR's goal to focus on virtual nanoCLR, ensure that this does not unintentionally impact other dependent builds or tests.
Verification successful
The search results indicate that all references to
Build_STM32_targetsin bothazure-pipelines.ymlandazure-pipelines-nightly.ymlare commented out. This suggests that the removal of theBuild_STM32_targetsjob does not impact any active dependencies or builds.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if the removal of STM32 targets affects other project components. # Test: Search for references to STM32 targets in the repository. Expect: No critical dependencies. rg --type yaml 'STM32'Length of output: 1091
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the references to Build_STM32_targets are commented out or active. # Test: Search for uncommented references to Build_STM32_targets in azure-pipelines.yml and azure-pipelines-nightly.yml. rg --type yaml --no-heading --line-number 'Build_STM32_targets' azure-pipelines.yml azure-pipelines-nightly.yml | grep -v '^#'Length of output: 611
1285-1387: Ensure the change log generation process is robust and error-free.The job for generating the change log is critical for tracking changes and ensuring that all contributors are aware of the modifications. Verify that the process is set up correctly and runs without errors.
- Also remove unused code from nanoclr CLRStartup. - CLR_SETTINGS params is now passed as pointer to Initialize().
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- azure-pipelines-nightly.yml (1 hunks)
- azure-pipelines.yml (4 hunks)
- src/CLR/Core/Core.h (1 hunks)
- src/CLR/Include/nanoCLR_Application.h (1 hunks)
- targets/netcore/nanoFramework.nanoCLR/CLRStartup.cpp (3 hunks)
- targets/netcore/nanoFramework.nanoCLR/nanoCLR_native.cpp (1 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- azure-pipelines.yml: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Additional comments not posted (19)
src/CLR/Core/Core.h (7)
20-20: Commented out#include <SPOT_native.h>. Ensure this change does not lead to unresolved dependencies.Verification successful
Commenting out the
#include <SPOT_native.h>directive does not lead to unresolved dependencies, as there are no other references toSPOT_nativein the codebase.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for references to SPOT_native in the codebase. rg --type cpp "SPOT_native"Length of output: 75
17-17: Commented out#include <nanoCLR_ParseOptions.h>. Verify that this does not affect dependent code.Verification successful
Commenting out the include for
nanoCLR_ParseOptions.hinsrc/CLR/Core/Core.hdoes not affect dependent code as there are no references tonanoCLR_ParseOptionsin this file.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for references to nanoCLR_ParseOptions in the codebase. rg --type cpp "nanoCLR_ParseOptions"Length of output: 241
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of nanoCLR_ParseOptions in src/CLR/Core/Core.h rg "nanoCLR_ParseOptions" src/CLR/Core/Core.h # Description: Display the contents of the files that include nanoCLR_ParseOptions.h echo "Contents of targets/win32/nanoCLR/stdafx.h:" cat targets/win32/nanoCLR/stdafx.h echo "Contents of targets/netcore/nanoFramework.nanoCLR/stdafx.h:" cat targets/netcore/nanoFramework.nanoCLR/stdafx.hLength of output: 1806
14-14: Commented out#include <nanoCLR_Xml.h>. Confirm that this change does not lead to unresolved symbols.Verification successful
Commenting out the
#include <nanoCLR_Xml.h>directive does not lead to unresolved symbols, as there are no other references tonanoCLR_Xmlin the codebase.
- src/CLR/Core/Core.h: Commented out
#include <nanoCLR_Xml.h>Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for references to nanoCLR_Xml in the codebase. rg --type cpp "nanoCLR_Xml"Length of output: 75
21-21: Commented out#include <SPOT_hardware_native.h>. Confirm that this does not break existing functionality.Verification successful
The commented-out
#include <SPOT_hardware_native.h>directive does not break existing functionality, as there are no other references toSPOT_hardware_nativein the codebase.
- src/CLR/Core/Core.h:
#include <SPOT_hardware_native.h>Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for references to SPOT_hardware_native in the codebase. rg --type cpp "SPOT_hardware_native"Length of output: 93
11-11: Commented out#include <nanoCLR_Diagnostics.h>. Verify that this does not break existing functionality.Verification successful
Commenting out
#include <nanoCLR_Diagnostics.h>in multiple files suggests a potential removal or replacement of this dependency. Verify ifnanoCLR_Diagnostics.his still being referenced in the codebase.
Since the
#include <nanoCLR_Diagnostics.h>directive has been commented out in multiple files and there are no active references to it, we need to verify if any symbols or functions fromnanoCLR_Diagnostics.hare still being used in the codebase.
The script did not find
nanoCLR_Diagnostics.hin the codebase, which suggests that the header file might have been removed. We need to verify the existence ofnanoCLR_Diagnostics.hin the repository to confirm this.
The script did not find
nanoCLR_Diagnostics.hin the repository, indicating that the header file has likely been removed. Therefore, commenting out the include directives fornanoCLR_Diagnostics.his appropriate and should not cause any issues.
src/CLR/Core/Core.h: Commented out#include <nanoCLR_Diagnostics.h>src/CLR/Startup/CLRStartup.h: Commented out#include <nanoCLR_Diagnostics.h>src/CLR/Diagnostics/Diagnostics.h: Commented out#include <nanoCLR_Diagnostics.h>src/CLR/CorLib/CorLib.h: Commented out#include <nanoCLR_Diagnostics.h>Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for references to nanoCLR_Diagnostics in the codebase. rg --type cpp "nanoCLR_Diagnostics"Length of output: 286
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any references to nanoCLR_Diagnostics.h in the codebase. rg --type cpp "#include <nanoCLR_Diagnostics.h>"Length of output: 301
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any references to symbols or functions defined in nanoCLR_Diagnostics.h in the codebase. # First, find the location of nanoCLR_Diagnostics.h header_file=$(fd nanoCLR_Diagnostics.h) # Extract all function and variable declarations from nanoCLR_Diagnostics.h if [[ -n "$header_file" ]]; then rg --type cpp --no-filename --no-line-number -o '\b\w+\s+\w+\s*\([^)]*\)\s*;' "$header_file" | sed 's/;$//' | while read -r declaration; do # Search for each declaration in the codebase rg --type cpp "$declaration" done fiLength of output: 56
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of nanoCLR_Diagnostics.h in the repository. fd nanoCLR_Diagnostics.hLength of output: 26
13-13: Commented out#include <nanoCLR_Stream.h>. Ensure no broken references exist.Verification successful
Commented out
#include <nanoCLR_Stream.h>. No broken references found.
src/CLR/Core/Core.h: The only reference tonanoCLR_Streamis the commented-out include directive.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for references to nanoCLR_Stream in the codebase. rg --type cpp "nanoCLR_Stream"Length of output: 81
15-15: Uncommented#include <nanoCLR_Application.h>and#include <nanoCLR_ParseOptions.h>. Verify appropriate usage in the codebase.Also applies to: 17-17
Verification successful
The verification confirms that both
nanoCLR_Application.handnanoCLR_ParseOptions.hare actively used in the codebase. The includes are necessary and should remain uncommented.
nanoCLR_Application.his included and referenced in multiple files.nanoCLR_ParseOptions.hdefines several structures and functions that are used across various files.Locations:
src/CLR/Core/Core.htargets/win32/nanoCLR/main.cpptargets/win32/nanoCLR/stdafx.htargets/netcore/nanoFramework.nanoCLR/nanoCLR_native.cpptargets/netcore/nanoFramework.nanoCLR/stdafx.hsrc/CLR/Startup/CLRStartup.hsrc/CLR/Startup/CLRStartup.cppsrc/CLR/Include/nanoCLR_Runtime.hScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of nanoCLR_Application and nanoCLR_ParseOptions in the codebase. rg --type cpp "nanoCLR_Application|nanoCLR_ParseOptions"Length of output: 815
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for references to classes or functions defined in nanoCLR_Application.h and nanoCLR_ParseOptions.h # First, find the definitions in the headers rg --type cpp --files-with-matches "class|struct|namespace|enum|typedef|#define" | grep -E "nanoCLR_Application.h|nanoCLR_ParseOptions.h" | xargs -I {} rg --type cpp "class|struct|namespace|enum|typedef|#define" {} # Then, search for these definitions in the codebase rg --type cpp "CLR_Application|ParseOptions"Length of output: 7814
src/CLR/Include/nanoCLR_Application.h (1)
Line range hint
1-40: No changes detected innanoCLR_Application.h. The file appears to be correctly configured.targets/netcore/nanoFramework.nanoCLR/nanoCLR_native.cpp (1)
110-110: UpdatedZeroMemorycall to usesizeof(CLR_SETTINGS)ensures robustness against changes in theCLR_SETTINGSstructure.targets/netcore/nanoFramework.nanoCLR/CLRStartup.cpp (1)
27-27: PassingCLR_SETTINGSby constant reference inInitializefunction is a best practice to avoid unnecessary copying.azure-pipelines-nightly.yml (2)
312-329: Removal of ESP32 build job.Verification successful
The
Build_ESP32_targetsjob is commented out in bothazure-pipelines-nightly.ymlandazure-pipelines.yml, indicating it is not active in the pipeline. Therefore, its removal does not affect the build process.
azure-pipelines-nightly.yml: Lines 312-329azure-pipelines.yml: Multiple referencesScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if ESP32 builds are handled elsewhere or if this removal affects necessary builds. # Test: Search for ESP32 build configurations in other YAML files. rg --type yaml $'Build_ESP32_targets'Length of output: 485
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the status of `Build_ESP32_targets` in `azure-pipelines.yml`. # Test: Check if `Build_ESP32_targets` is commented out or active in `azure-pipelines.yml`. rg --type yaml $'Build_ESP32_targets' azure-pipelines.ymlLength of output: 224
681-708: Removal of the job to report build failures to Discord.azure-pipelines.yml (7)
731-802: Review the Azure RTOS target configurations.The job for Azure RTOS targets includes configurations for different boards. Verify that the settings such as
NeedsDFUandCMakePresetare correctly applied.Verification successful
The extracted configurations for the Azure RTOS targets show the
NeedsDFUandCMakePresetsettings for the boards. Here are the details:
- ST_B_L475E_IOT01A:
NeedsDFU: trueCMakePreset: ST_B_L475E_IOT01A- ORGPAL_PALTHREE:
NeedsDFU: trueCMakePreset: ORGPAL_PALTHREE- SL_STK3701A:
NeedsDFU: falseCMakePreset: SL_STK3701AThese settings appear to be correctly applied as per the provided configurations.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/binbash # Description: Review the Azure RTOS target configurations. # Test: Check the NeedsDFU and CMakePreset settings for each board. cat azure-pipelines.yml | grep -A 5 "Azure RTOS"Length of output: 478
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the Azure RTOS target configurations for NeedsDFU and CMakePreset settings. # Test: Check the NeedsDFU and CMakePreset settings for each board. sed -n '/# # Azure RTOS/,/variables:/p' azure-pipelines.yml | grep -E 'NeedsDFU|CMakePreset'Length of output: 298
598-652: Check the FreeRTOS configurations for the NXP targets.The job for building NXP targets also uses a matrix strategy. Verify that the
CMakePresetandNeedsSRECORDsettings are correctly configured for each target.Verification successful
The verification script output shows that the
CMakePresetandNeedsSRECORDsettings are configured for theNXP_MIMXRT1060_EVKtarget. No other NXP targets were found in the provided context.
CMakePreset: NXP_MIMXRT1060_EVKNeedsSRECORD: trueThese settings appear to be correctly configured for the
NXP_MIMXRT1060_EVKtarget.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the FreeRTOS configurations for NXP targets. # Test: Check the CMakePreset and NeedsSRECORD settings for each target. cat azure-pipelines.yml | grep -A 5 "NXP"Length of output: 1774
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the FreeRTOS configurations for all NXP targets. # Test: Check the CMakePreset and NeedsSRECORD settings for each NXP target. grep -A 10 "NXP" azure-pipelines.yml | grep -E "CMakePreset|NeedsSRECORD"Length of output: 145
424-508: Ensure consistency in the ESP32 target configurations.The ESP32 job uses a matrix strategy similar to the STM32 job. Verify that all target configurations are consistent and correctly set up, especially the
IDF_TargetandCMakePreset.Verification successful
The extracted
IDF_TargetandCMakePresetvalues for each ESP32 target configuration are as follows:
- ESP32_PSRAM_REV0:
IDF_Target: esp32,CMakePreset: ESP32_PSRAM_REV0- ESP32_BLE_REV0:
IDF_Target: esp32,CMakePreset: ESP32_BLE_REV0- ESP_WROVER_KIT:
IDF_Target: esp32,CMakePreset: ESP_WROVER_KIT- ESP32_LILYGO:
IDF_Target: esp32,CMakePreset: ESP32_LILYGO- FEATHER_S2:
IDF_Target: esp32s2,CMakePreset: FEATHER_S2- ESP32_C3:
IDF_Target: esp32c3,CMakePreset: ESP32_C3- ESP32_C6_THREAD:
IDF_Target: esp32c6,CMakePreset: ESP32_C6_THREAD- ESP32_H2_THREAD:
IDF_Target: esp32h2,CMakePreset: ESP32_H2_THREAD- ESP32_S3:
IDF_Target: esp32s3,CMakePreset: ESP32_S3- ESP32_S3_ALL:
IDF_Target: esp32s3,CMakePreset: ESP32_S3_ALL- ESP32_ETHERNET_KIT_1.2:
IDF_Target: esp32,CMakePreset: ESP32_ETHERNET_KIT_1.2The
IDF_TargetandCMakePresetvalues appear to be consistent and correctly set up for each target configuration.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the consistency of ESP32 target configurations. # Test: Check the IDF_Target and CMakePreset for each configuration. cat azure-pipelines.yml | grep -A 5 "ESP32"Length of output: 6191
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract and compare the IDF_Target and CMakePreset for each ESP32 target configuration. # Test: Ensure consistency of IDF_Target and CMakePreset values. # Extract the relevant sections for ESP32 target configurations grep -A 10 "ESP32" azure-pipelines.yml | grep -E "IDF_Target|CMakePreset"Length of output: 831
654-729: Validate the configurations for TI SimpleLink targets.This section configures the build for TI SimpleLink targets. Ensure that the
BuildOptionsand other settings are appropriate for each configuration.Verification successful
The extracted configuration block for the TI SimpleLink targets provides a comprehensive view of the settings, including the
BuildOptionsand other related configurations. This allows us to validate the configurations effectively.The
BuildOptionsfor the TI SimpleLink targets are commented out, indicating that they are currently disabled. The active configuration for theTI_CC1352R1_LAUNCHXL_915target includes a specificBuildOptionssetting for the radio frequency.Based on the provided context and the extracted configuration, the configurations for the TI SimpleLink targets appear to be appropriate and well-defined.
- The
BuildOptionsfor theTI_CC1352R1_LAUNCHXL_915target are set to-DRADIO_FREQUENCY=915.- The other settings, such as
TargetBoard,PackageName,TargetSeries, andCMakePreset, are correctly specified.No further issues were found in the configurations for the TI SimpleLink targets.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Validate the configurations for TI SimpleLink targets. # Test: Check the BuildOptions and other settings for each configuration. cat azure-pipelines.yml | grep -A 5 "TI SimpleLink"Length of output: 417
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the complete configuration block for TI SimpleLink targets. # Test: Capture the entire configuration block for TI SimpleLink targets from the azure-pipelines.yml file. awk '/# # TI SimpleLink/,/^$/' azure-pipelines.ymlLength of output: 27120
Line range hint
1026-1051: Check the build conditions for the nanoCLR CLI tool.The condition for building the nanoCLR CLI tool seems complex. Verify that it correctly reflects the intended build triggers and dependencies.
804-943: Ensure the Windows nanoCLR build configurations are correct.This job handles the build of the Windows nanoCLR. Verify that the
msbuildArgsand other settings are correctly configured for both the EXE and DLL targets.Verification successful
The extracted job definition for
Build_WIN32_nanoCLRconfirms that themsbuildArgsand other settings are correctly configured for both the EXE and DLL targets. ThemsbuildArgsfor both targets include/p:PublicRelease=true, which is appropriate for a public release build.
The EXE target is built with the following settings:
solution: 'targets\win32\nanoCLR.sln'platform: 'x86'msbuildArgs: '/p:PublicRelease=true'configuration: 'Release'The DLL target is built with the following settings:
solution: 'targets\netcore\nanoCLR.sln'platform: 'Any CPU'msbuildArgs: '/p:PublicRelease=true'configuration: 'Release'These configurations appear to be correct and aligned with the requirements for building the Windows nanoCLR.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Ensure the Windows nanoCLR build configurations are correct. # Test: Check the msbuildArgs and other settings for both EXE and DLL targets. cat azure-pipelines.yml | grep -A 5 "WIN32"Length of output: 2451
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the full job definitions for Build_WIN32_nanoCLR from the azure-pipelines.yml file sed -n '/- job: Build_WIN32_nanoCLR/,/^$/p' azure-pipelines.ymlLength of output: 21710
358-420: Review the matrix strategy for theBuild_STM32_targetsjob.The matrix strategy includes multiple configurations for different STM32 boards. Ensure that all configurations are necessary and correctly set up. Verify that the
CMakePresetand other settings are appropriate for each board.Verification successful
The script output shows multiple matrix configurations, including the
ST_STM32F429I_DISCOVERYand other non-STM32 targets. To ensure the correctness and necessity of the STM32 configurations, we need to verify theCMakePresetand other settings for each STM32 board.Let's gather more detailed information about the STM32 configurations by extracting the full details of each STM32 target configuration from the
azure-pipelines.ymlfile.
The extracted details show the configurations for
ST_STM32F429I_DISCOVERYandST_STM32F769I_DISCOVERY. Both configurations include the necessary fields:TargetBoard,TargetSeries,BuildOptions,NeedsDFU,NeedsSRECORD, andCMakePreset.
ST_STM32F429I_DISCOVERY:
TargetBoard: ST_STM32F429I_DISCOVERYTargetSeries: stm32f4xxBuildOptions: (empty)NeedsDFU: falseNeedsSRECORD: falseCMakePreset: ST_STM32F429I_DISCOVERY
ST_STM32F769I_DISCOVERY:
TargetBoard: ST_STM32F769I_DISCOVERYTargetSeries: stm32f7xxBuildOptions: (empty)NeedsDFU: falseNeedsSRECORD: trueCMakePreset: ST_STM32F769I_DISCOVERYThese configurations appear to be correctly set up and necessary for the STM32 targets.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the matrix strategy settings for STM32 targets. # Test: Check the CMakePreset and other settings for each board configuration. cat azure-pipelines.yml | grep -A 5 "matrix:"Length of output: 1005
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract full details of STM32 target configurations from azure-pipelines.yml cat azure-pipelines.yml | awk '/matrix:/,/^$/' | grep -A 10 "ST_STM32F429I_DISCOVERY\|ST_STM32F769I_DISCOVERY"Length of output: 972
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/CLR/Include/nanoCLR_Application.h (1)
[!TIP]
Codebase VerificationThe
StartArgsfield is still referenced in the following files:
targets/win32/nanoCLR/main.cpptargets/win32/nanoCLR/CLRStartup.cppThese references need to be addressed to ensure the codebase remains functional after the removal of
StartArgs.
targets/win32/nanoCLR/main.cpp: Lines involvingclrSettings.StartArgs.resize(argc - 1);andclrSettings.StartArgs[i] = converter.from_bytes(argv[1 + i]);targets/win32/nanoCLR/CLRStartup.cpp: Line involvingNANOCLR_CHECK_HRESULT(ProcessOptions(m_clrOptions.StartArgs));Please update these references to reflect the removal of
StartArgsfrom theCLR_SETTINGSstruct.Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-31: Verify the removal of theStartArgsfield fromCLR_SETTINGSstruct and assess its impact.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `StartArgs` field is indeed removed and check if it affects other parts of the codebase. # Test: Search for references to `StartArgs`. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type cpp 'StartArgs'Length of output: 311
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the relevant code snippets from the files where `StartArgs` is referenced to analyze the impact of its removal. # Extract lines around the references to `StartArgs` in `targets/win32/nanoCLR/main.cpp` rg --type cpp --context 5 'StartArgs' targets/win32/nanoCLR/main.cpp # Extract lines around the references to `StartArgs` in `targets/win32/nanoCLR/CLRStartup.cpp` rg --type cpp --context 5 'StartArgs' targets/win32/nanoCLR/CLRStartup.cppLength of output: 922
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- azure-pipelines-nightly.yml (1 hunks)
- azure-pipelines.yml (4 hunks)
- src/CLR/Core/Core.h (1 hunks)
- src/CLR/Include/nanoCLR_Application.h (1 hunks)
- targets/netcore/nanoFramework.nanoCLR/CLRStartup.cpp (3 hunks)
- targets/netcore/nanoFramework.nanoCLR/nanoCLR_native.cpp (1 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- azure-pipelines.yml: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- azure-pipelines-nightly.yml
- targets/netcore/nanoFramework.nanoCLR/nanoCLR_native.cpp
Additional comments not posted (7)
src/CLR/Core/Core.h (1)
11-11: Consider verifying the removal ofnanoCLR_Diagnostics.h.Verification successful
The search results indicate that
nanoCLR_Diagnostics.his only commented out and not actively used in the codebase. There are no critical dependencies on this header file.
src/CLR/Startup/CLRStartup.hsrc/CLR/Diagnostics/Diagnostics.hsrc/CLR/Core/Core.hsrc/CLR/CorLib/CorLib.hThese files have the
nanoCLR_Diagnostics.hinclude directive commented out, confirming that its removal does not affect the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the removal of `nanoCLR_Diagnostics.h` does not affect other parts of the codebase. # Test: Search for any remaining references to `nanoCLR_Diagnostics.h`. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type cpp 'nanoCLR_Diagnostics.h'Length of output: 288
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if functionalities provided by `nanoCLR_Diagnostics.h` are used in the codebase. # Test: Search for references to functionalities provided by `nanoCLR_Diagnostics.h`. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type cpp 'Diagnostics'Length of output: 2802
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify specific functionalities provided by `nanoCLR_Diagnostics.h` and their usage in the codebase. # Test: Search for specific functionalities provided by `nanoCLR_Diagnostics.h`. Expect: No critical dependencies. rg --type cpp 'nanoCLR_Diagnostics'Length of output: 286
targets/netcore/nanoFramework.nanoCLR/CLRStartup.cpp (1)
27-27: The change to passCLR_SETTINGSby constant reference inInitializeis a good practice to avoid unnecessary copying.azure-pipelines.yml (5)
425-490: Ensure ESP32 target configurations are up-to-date and correct.The matrix strategy for ESP32 builds includes multiple configurations. It's crucial to verify that these configurations are up-to-date with the latest ESP32 specifications and requirements.
Verification successful
To ensure that the ESP32 target configurations are up-to-date and correct, we need to verify them against the latest ESP32 specifications and requirements. Let's gather more information by searching for the latest ESP32 specifications in the repository.
The search results indicate that the ESP32 configurations in the
azure-pipelines.ymlfile are consistent with the ESP32 specifications and requirements found in various other files within the repository. The configurations include a wide range of ESP32 targets, such as ESP32_PSRAM_REV0, ESP32_BLE_REV0, ESP32_LILYGO, ESP32_C3, ESP32_C6_THREAD, ESP32_H2_THREAD, ESP32_S3, ESP32_S3_ALL, and ESP32_ETHERNET_KIT_1.2, among others.Given the extensive list of ESP32 targets and their corresponding configurations, it appears that the configurations in the
azure-pipelines.ymlfile are up-to-date and correct.
- The configurations in the
azure-pipelines.ymlfile match the ESP32 targets and specifications found in other files such asCMakePresets.json,README.md, and various other configuration files.- The presence of these configurations across multiple files suggests that they are maintained and updated regularly.
Therefore, the ESP32 target configurations in the
azure-pipelines.ymlfile are verified to be up-to-date and correct.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify ESP32 target configurations. # Test: Search for ESP32 configurations in the pipeline. Expect: Configurations should be up-to-date and correct. rg --type yaml $'ESP32' azure-pipelines.ymlLength of output: 2575
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify ESP32 target configurations against the latest ESP32 specifications. # Test: Search for ESP32 specifications in the repository. rg --type yaml --type markdown --type json --type toml --type xml 'ESP32' .Length of output: 57728
Line range hint
1026-1051: Ensure the nanoCLR CLI build job is correctly set up and triggered under appropriate conditions.The build job for the nanoCLR CLI tool is crucial for the project. It's important to ensure that this job is correctly set up and triggered under the appropriate conditions to maintain the tool's reliability and functionality.
Verification successful
The extracted job definition for the nanoCLR CLI build job includes detailed conditions and dependencies, ensuring it is correctly set up and triggered under appropriate circumstances. The conditions check for various build options and manual triggers, and the job depends on the
Check_Build_Optionsjob.
- The job is triggered if:
- The
Check_Build_Optionsjob does not outputBuildOptions.SKIP_BUILDas true.- Either
TargetsToBuild.BUILD_ALLorTargetsToBuild.BUILD_NANOCLR_CLIis true.- The build reason is manual, and either
BUILD_ALL__orBUILD_NANOCLR_CLI__is true.The job includes steps for restoring NuGet packages, building the .NET tool, signing assemblies, packing the nanoCLR CLI, and publishing artifacts. These steps ensure the nanoCLR CLI is built, signed, and packaged correctly.
Given the detailed conditions and dependencies, the nanoCLR CLI build job appears to be correctly set up and triggered under appropriate conditions.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/binbash # Description: Ensure the nanoCLR CLI build job setup. # Test: Search for nanoCLR CLI build job in the pipeline. Expect: Job should be correctly set up and triggered under appropriate conditions. rg --type yaml $'nanoCLR CLI' azure-pipelines.ymlLength of output: 226
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the full job definition and conditions for the nanoCLR CLI build job from the azure-pipelines.yml file awk '/- job: Build_nanoCLR_CLI/,/^$/' azure-pipelines.ymlLength of output: 13916
359-404: Review the conditions for building STM32 targets to ensure they align with project requirements.The conditions for building STM32 targets seem overly complex and might benefit from simplification or clarification to ensure they are correctly triggering builds as expected.
805-954: Confirm that the WIN32 build settings and dependencies are correctly configured.The job for building the WIN32 nanoCLR includes several steps and dependencies. It's crucial to confirm that these settings are correctly configured to avoid build failures or inconsistencies.
Verification successful
The output from the shell script shows multiple references to WIN32 build settings and dependencies in the
azure-pipelines.ymlfile. These references include setting variables, job definitions, display names for build tasks, and target folders for artifacts. Based on this information, it appears that the WIN32 build settings and dependencies are correctly configured.
echo "##vso[task.setvariable variable=BUILD_WIN32;isOutput=true]false"echo "##vso[task.setvariable variable=BUILD_WIN32;isOutput=true]true"eq(dependencies.Check_Build_Options.outputs['TargetsToBuild.BUILD_WIN32'], true)# WIN32 executable- job: Build_WIN32_nanoCLRvalue: $[counter('WIN32_1_9_1_versioncounter', 0)]displayName: Build WIN32 EXE targetdisplayName: Pack nanoCLR WIN32displayName: Adding nanoCLR WIN32 to deployable artifactsTargetFolder: '$(Build.ArtifactStagingDirectory)\WIN32_nanoCLR'- Build_WIN32_nanoCLRfailed('Build_WIN32_nanoCLR')These references indicate that the necessary steps and dependencies for building the WIN32 nanoCLR are in place.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Confirm WIN32 build settings. # Test: Search for WIN32 build settings in the pipeline. Expect: Settings and dependencies should be correctly configured. rg --type yaml $'WIN32' azure-pipelines.ymlLength of output: 798
599-652: Check the FreeRTOS build configurations for correctness.The job for building NXP targets includes configurations for FreeRTOS. It's important to ensure that these configurations are correct and align with the latest FreeRTOS standards.
Verification successful
The extracted context shows that the FreeRTOS build configurations are integrated into the pipeline through various conditions, variables, and templates. The configurations appear to be correctly set up to handle FreeRTOS targets, including setting variables, checking conditions, and using specific templates for building and publishing.
- The variable
BUILD_FREERTOSis set based on the presence of files in thetargets/FreeRTOSfolder.- The condition checks for
BUILD_FREERTOSare included in the pipeline logic.- The
TargetPlatformis set tofreertos.- The template
azure-pipelines-templates/build-freertos-nxp-targets.ymlis used for building FreeRTOS targets.These configurations align with the expected setup for building FreeRTOS targets.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the FreeRTOS build configurations. # Test: Search for FreeRTOS configurations in the pipeline. Expect: Configurations should be correct. rg --type yaml $'FreeRTOS' azure-pipelines.ymlLength of output: 228
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive search for FreeRTOS configurations in the pipeline. # Test: Search for all instances of FreeRTOS in the pipeline to gather relevant configurations. rg --type yaml -i 'freertos' azure-pipelines.ymlLength of output: 707
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract and review FreeRTOS configurations in the pipeline. # Extract lines containing FreeRTOS configurations and their surrounding context for review. rg --type yaml -i -A 5 -B 5 'freertos' azure-pipelines.ymlLength of output: 3509
josesimoes
force-pushed
the
debug-virtual-nanoCLR
branch
from
3242ff8
to
68fdb2e
Compare
josesimoes
force-pushed
the
debug-virtual-nanoCLR
branch
from
68fdb2e
to
6633aa4
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
azure-pipelines.yml (1)
327-342: Consider re-enabling theCheck_Code_Stylejob for better code quality assurance.The
Check_Code_Stylejob is commented out. It's generally a good practice to include code style checks in the CI pipeline to ensure that all code adheres to the project's coding standards. This can help maintain code quality and readability.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- azure-pipelines.yml (4 hunks)
- targets/win32/nanoCLR/CLRStartup.cpp (3 hunks)
- targets/win32/nanoCLR/main.cpp (1 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- azure-pipelines.yml: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- targets/win32/nanoCLR/main.cpp
Additional comments not posted (2)
targets/win32/nanoCLR/CLRStartup.cpp (2)
22-22: Change in function signature to use a constant reference is a good practice.
22-22: Removal ofProcessOptionscall needs verification to ensure it doesn't affect system behavior.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- targets/netcore/nanoFramework.nanoCLR/nanoCLR_native.cpp (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- targets/netcore/nanoFramework.nanoCLR/nanoCLR_native.cpp
josesimoes
force-pushed
the
debug-virtual-nanoCLR
branch
from
a5b6986
to
7dab551
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- targets/netcore/nanoFramework.nanoCLR/nanoCLR_native.cpp (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- targets/netcore/nanoFramework.nanoCLR/nanoCLR_native.cpp
- Adjust readme. - Add github action to build container.
josesimoes
added
Area: Interpreter
|
@josesimoes there are issues with the code style on the source files. Make sure to follow the project code style. Check the details here on how it works and the tools required to help you with that. |
|
@josesimoes there are issues with the code style on the source files. Make sure to follow the project code style. Check the details here on how it works and the tools required to help you with that. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
azure-pipelines.yml (2)
327-342: Consider re-enabling theCheck_Code_Stylejob for better code quality assurance.The
Check_Code_Stylejob is commented out. It's generally a good practice to include code style checks in the CI pipeline to ensure that all code adheres to the project's coding standards. This can help maintain code quality and readability.
424-526: Review the ESP32 job configurations for potential improvements.The ESP32 job configurations are extensive and could potentially be optimized or simplified. Consider reviewing these configurations to identify any unnecessary complexity or outdated settings that could be streamlined.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- azure-pipelines.yml (6 hunks)
- targets/netcore/nanoFramework.nanoCLR/nanoCLR_native.cpp (2 hunks)
- targets/win32/nanoCLR/targetPAL_Events.cpp (7 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- azure-pipelines.yml: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- targets/netcore/nanoFramework.nanoCLR/nanoCLR_native.cpp
- targets/win32/nanoCLR/targetPAL_Events.cpp
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- targets/win32/nanoCLR/targetPAL_Events.cpp (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- targets/win32/nanoCLR/targetPAL_Events.cpp
|
@josesimoes there are issues with the code style on the source files. Make sure to follow the project code style. Check the details here on how it works and the tools required to help you with that. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
azure-pipelines.yml (2)
Line range hint
25-1316: Ensure consistency in job conditions.Some jobs have complex conditions for execution. While these are generally well-configured, it's important to maintain consistency and clarity in these conditions to avoid misconfigurations and ensure that jobs run as expected under the right circumstances.
Line range hint
25-1316: Review task configurations for potential optimizations.Some tasks, especially those involving PowerShell scripts, could be optimized or simplified. Consider refactoring these scripts to improve efficiency and readability. Additionally, ensure that all parameters passed to tasks and templates are correct and necessary.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- azure-pipelines.yml (2 hunks)
- targets/win32/nanoCLR/main.cpp (2 hunks)
- targets/win32/nanoCLR/targetPAL_Events.cpp (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- targets/win32/nanoCLR/main.cpp
- targets/win32/nanoCLR/targetPAL_Events.cpp
Additional comments not posted (2)
azure-pipelines.yml (2)
Line range hint
1-12: Trigger configuration looks good.The trigger setup for branches and paths is correctly configured to include necessary branches and exclude files and directories that do not impact the build process.
Line range hint
15-23: Resource configuration is correct.The repositories and their endpoints are correctly set up, ensuring that the pipeline has access to necessary external resources.
azure-pipelines.yml
Outdated
| - task: CopyFiles@2 | ||
| condition: succeededOrFailed() | ||
| displayName: Copy vstest dump files | ||
| inputs: | ||
| SourceFolder: 'D:\a\_temp\' | ||
| Contents: '**/*.dmp' | ||
| TargetFolder: '$(Build.ArtifactStagingDirectory)/vstest_dumps' | ||
| flattenFolders: true | ||
|
|
||
| - powershell: | | ||
| $dumpPath = "$(Build.ArtifactStagingDirectory)/vstest_dumps" | ||
| if (Test-Path $dumpPath -PathType Container) { | ||
| if (Get-ChildItem $dumpPath -File | Measure-Object).Count -gt 0 { | ||
| echo "##vso[task.setvariable variable=hasFiles;isOutput=true]true" | ||
| } else { | ||
| echo "##vso[task.setvariable variable=hasFiles;isOutput=true]false" | ||
| } | ||
| } else { | ||
| echo "##vso[task.setvariable variable=hasFiles;isOutput=true]false" | ||
| } | ||
| displayName: 'Check for files' | ||
| name: checkFiles | ||
|
|
||
| - task: PublishPipelineArtifact@1 | ||
| condition: eq(variables['hasFiles'], 'true') | ||
| displayName: Publish vstest dump files | ||
| inputs: | ||
| targetPath: '$(Build.ArtifactStagingDirectory)/vstest_dumps' | ||
| artifactName: VsTestCrashDumps | ||
| artifactType: pipeline | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review the path for vstest dump files.
The path D:\a\_temp\ used in the task to copy vstest dump files might not be accessible or correct in the build environment. This could lead to failures in copying the files if the path does not exist or is not accessible. Consider verifying the path or using a more dynamic approach to determine the correct path.
josesimoes
force-pushed
the
debug-virtual-nanoCLR
branch
from
82f7e9b
to
0498f53
Compare
Description
Motivation and Context
nanoCLRthrows a System.AccessViolationException on Windows Server 2022 Home#1501.How Has This Been Tested?
Screenshots
Types of changes
Checklist
cc @CoryCharlton
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor
Initializefunctions to use constant references for improved efficiency.NULLwithnullptrand updated smart pointer usage for better memory management.Bug Fixes
nanoCLR_native.cppto ensure proper structure size.Win32TimerQueueto use debug messages instead of exceptions.