You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I tried reproducing the UCF101 results under zero-shot setting (not generalized) with the .mat files shared in the repo. If I am not wrong the key "att" in the .mat file corresponds to manual attributes and not word2vec vector because the key "original_att" contains one-hot vector (hence I am assuming it's attributes). But I am unable to reproduce the result of 38% accuracy from the paper. I am getting on average 25% accuracy. Is it possible that the .mat file for UCF contains word2vec representation and not the manual attributes?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I tried reproducing the UCF101 results under zero-shot setting (not generalized) with the .mat files shared in the repo. If I am not wrong the key "att" in the .mat file corresponds to manual attributes and not word2vec vector because the key "original_att" contains one-hot vector (hence I am assuming it's attributes). But I am unable to reproduce the result of 38% accuracy from the paper. I am getting on average 25% accuracy. Is it possible that the .mat file for UCF contains word2vec representation and not the manual attributes?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: