Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reproducing UCF results. #8

Open
prashastbindal opened this issue Sep 22, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Reproducing UCF results. #8

prashastbindal opened this issue Sep 22, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@prashastbindal
Copy link

prashastbindal commented Sep 22, 2020

I tried reproducing the UCF101 results under zero-shot setting (not generalized) with the .mat files shared in the repo. If I am not wrong the key "att" in the .mat file corresponds to manual attributes and not word2vec vector because the key "original_att" contains one-hot vector (hence I am assuming it's attributes). But I am unable to reproduce the result of 38% accuracy from the paper. I am getting on average 25% accuracy. Is it possible that the .mat file for UCF contains word2vec representation and not the manual attributes?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant