-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update grut699-vxworks6 cfe_psp_timer.c per white box unit testing results #40
Comments
Imported from trac issue 36. Created by dasp on 2015-08-13T19:13:00, last modified: 2019-05-06T11:51:35 |
Trac comment by sduran on 2015-08-17 11:50:52: If sysTimestampFreq() returns a value less then 1000000UL, it would mean the processor's system clock is less than 1MHz - The SPARC runs at 25MHz and higher, 75MHz on our test board, >=100MHz for Orion. Since this PSP is only for the ut699 SPARC Leon3, I think it is safe to say that we will not be using this code on a processor running less than 1MHz. |
Trac comment by abrown4 on 2015-09-01 20:17:18: Unit test needs to be updated to remove the failing placeholder test. |
Trac comment by jhageman on 2019-05-06 11:51:35: Specific to non-community PSP so closing as invalid. Note changes were merged to techdev-pc-linux-uei, techdev-sp0-vxworks6.9 branches (but not techdev-ut699 for some reason). Not in framework release. |
During white box testing the following issue was identified with the grut699-vxworks6 version of cfe_psp_timer.c
lower /= sysTimestampFreq() / 1000000UL
if sysTimestampFreq() returns a number less than 1000000UL.
Issue identified during #14 white box testing commit: [changeset:eade737]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: