-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 206
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cFE Integration Candidate: Caelum+dev2 #2019
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Fix #1823, FS Functional test
…ake-func Fix #1997, Mismatched foreach in cmake function
Corrects the implicit type conversion from an osal_id_t to an integer, making it explicit by using the OS_ObjectIdToInteger() conversion function.
Cleans up the array length calculation for perf structs to not assume a specific base element type (uint32). This also makes the definitions much more readable.
Fix #2016, cFE Application Developers Guide.md: specify language for improved code highlighting
Fix #2030, array length calculation for perf structs
Fix #2022, Limit SBR UT loops
astrogeco
force-pushed
the
integration-candidate
branch
from
January 19, 2022 20:16
0d7f6b8
to
3f4d4b0
Compare
astrogeco
changed the title
cFS Integration candidate: Caelum+dev2
cFE Integration candidate: Caelum+dev2
Jan 20, 2022
astrogeco
force-pushed
the
integration-candidate
branch
from
January 21, 2022 04:22
8d258df
to
c1aa63d
Compare
2 tasks
astrogeco
force-pushed
the
integration-candidate
branch
from
January 21, 2022 19:39
ee3a502
to
a0a3be0
Compare
Fix #2032, Add CFE_ES_AppInfo_t element documentation
astrogeco
force-pushed
the
integration-candidate
branch
from
January 21, 2022 20:49
a0a3be0
to
b4fb004
Compare
astrogeco
changed the title
cFE Integration candidate: Caelum+dev2
cFE Integration Candidate: Caelum+dev2
Jan 21, 2022
astrogeco
added a commit
to nasa/cFS
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 21, 2022
Combines: nasa/cFE#2019, cFE v7.0.0-rc4+dev60 nasa/osal#1212, osal v6.0.0-rc4+dev29 nasa/sch_lab#105, sch_lab v2.5.0-rc4+dev13 Includes: *cFE* nasa/cFE#2033, Add CFE_ES_AppInfo_t element documentation nasa/cFE#2011, Reuse CodeQL, Static Analysis, and Format Check nasa/cFE#2015, Add FS Functional test nasa/cFE#2012, Fix mismatched foreach in cmake function nasa/cFE#2013, Improved code highlighting in cFE Application Developers Guide nasa/cFE#2027, CFE_FS_ParseInputFileNameEx avoid uninit var nasa/cFE#2031, Fix array length calculation for perf structs nasa/cFE#2023, Limit SBR UT loops nasa/cFE#2029, Initialize BlockData in ES UT nasa/cFE#2025, Fix osal_id_t type conversion in es_UT.c *osal* nasa/osal#1206, Search global and local symbol tables nasa/osal#1201, Add missing space to UtAssert_STUB_COUNT nasa/osal#1202, Add UINT8 and UINT16 equivalents for UtAssert_UINT32_<Comparison> macros nasa/osal#1203, correct warnings on gcc11 nasa/osal#1211, Set output in OS_stat handler nasa/osal#1190, Reuse CodeQL, Static Analysis, Format Check *other* nasa/sch_lab#104, Add option to configure base tick rate *Continuous Integration Updates* nasa/PSP#317, Reuse CodeQL, Static Analysis, and Format Check nasa/sample_lib#72, Reuse CodeQL, Static Analysis, and Format Check nasa/sample_app#162, Reuse CodeQL, Static Analysis, and Format Check nasa/ci_lab#100, Reuse CodeQL, Static Analysis, and Format Check nasa/to_lab#111, Reuse CodeQL, Static Analysis, and Format Check nasa/tblCRCTool#59, Reuse CodeQL, Static Analysis, and Format Check nasa/elf2cfetbl#97, Reuse CodeQL, Static Analysis, and Format Check nasa/cFS-GroundSystem#200, Reuse CodeQL, Static Analysis, and Format Check Co-authored-by: Ariel Adams <ArielSAdamsNASA@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Jacob Hageman <skliper@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Joseph Hickey <jphickey@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Kurtis Dinelle <kurtjd@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Paul <paulober@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Adrien Chardon <Nodraak@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Describe the contribution
PR #2033
PR #2015,
PR #2012,
PR #2013,
PR #2027,
PR #2031,
PR #2023,
PR #2029,
PR #2025,
PR #2011
Testing performed
cFE Checks https://github.com/nasa/cFE/pull/2019/checks
cFS Bundle Checks https://github.com/nasa/cFS/pull/410/checks
Expected behavior changes
See PRs
System(s) tested on
Ubuntu 18.04
RTEMS (bundle level)
Additional context
Part of nasa/cFS#410
Third party code
None
Contributor Info - All information REQUIRED for consideration of pull request
@ArielSAdamsNASA
@skliper
@jphickey
@paulober
@Nodraak