-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 202
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix #807, Add ES Application Behavior Functional Tests #1778
Merged
astrogeco
merged 1 commit into
nasa:integration-candidate
from
zanzaben:fix807_ES_Behavior_Func_Test
Aug 13, 2021
Merged
Fix #807, Add ES Application Behavior Functional Tests #1778
astrogeco
merged 1 commit into
nasa:integration-candidate
from
zanzaben:fix807_ES_Behavior_Func_Test
Aug 13, 2021
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
zanzaben
added
the
CCB:Ready
Ready for discussion at the Configuration Control Board (CCB)
label
Aug 9, 2021
zanzaben
force-pushed
the
fix807_ES_Behavior_Func_Test
branch
from
August 9, 2021 17:17
f86e57e
to
cf2e720
Compare
skliper
requested changes
Aug 11, 2021
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good except for noted remnants below.
skliper
requested changes
Aug 11, 2021
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remnants from another test?
astrogeco
removed
the
CCB:Ready
Ready for discussion at the Configuration Control Board (CCB)
label
Aug 11, 2021
zanzaben
force-pushed
the
fix807_ES_Behavior_Func_Test
branch
from
August 11, 2021 14:57
cf2e720
to
41667d6
Compare
zanzaben
added
CCB:Ready
Ready for discussion at the Configuration Control Board (CCB)
and removed
CCB:Ready
Ready for discussion at the Configuration Control Board (CCB)
labels
Aug 11, 2021
skliper
approved these changes
Aug 11, 2021
skliper
approved these changes
Aug 11, 2021
CCB:2021-08-11 APPROVED |
astrogeco
added
the
CCB:Approved
Indicates code review and approval by community CCB
label
Aug 11, 2021
astrogeco
added a commit
to nasa/cFS
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 13, 2021
- Add ES Application Behavior Functional Tests
2 tasks
astrogeco
added a commit
to nasa/cFS
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 17, 2021
**Combines** nasa/cFE#1808, v6.8.0-rc1+dev873 **Includes** - nasa/cFE#1790, Port "CFE_UtAssert_SuccessCheck" and related macros from coverage test to functional test #1784, add CFE assert macros to functional test - nasa/cFE#1779, Adds invalid id syslog to for CFE_ES_DeleteApp and CFE_ES_ReloadApp and verifies required reporting - nasa/cFE#1785, Stop memory leak & add cds size test. - nasa/cFE#1765, Mark read only inputs as const - nasa/cFE#1804, Check resource ID idx is less than max - nasa/cFE#1778, Add ES Application Behavior Functional Tests - nasa/cFE#1801, Update CFE_ES_RunLoop documentation - nasa/cFE#1745, Add Message Api Functional Test - nasa/cFE#1798, update in/out status and nonnull/nonzero tags - nasa/cFE#1783, Add External Time Source Functional Tests - nasa/cFE#1800, Add Perf API functional tests Co-authored-by: Jacob Hageman <skliper@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Joseph Hickey <jphickey@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Alex Campbell <zanzaben@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Niall Mullane <nmullane@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Paul <pavll@users.noreply.github.com>
astrogeco
added a commit
to nasa/cFS
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 17, 2021
**Combines** nasa/cFE#1808, v6.8.0-rc1+dev873 **Includes** - nasa/cFE#1790, Port "CFE_UtAssert_SuccessCheck" and related macros from coverage test to functional test #1784, add CFE assert macros to functional test - nasa/cFE#1779, Adds invalid id syslog to for CFE_ES_DeleteApp and CFE_ES_ReloadApp and verifies required reporting - nasa/cFE#1785, Stop memory leak & add cds size test. - nasa/cFE#1765, Mark read only inputs as const - nasa/cFE#1804, Check resource ID idx is less than max - nasa/cFE#1778, Add ES Application Behavior Functional Tests - nasa/cFE#1801, Update CFE_ES_RunLoop documentation - nasa/cFE#1745, Add Message Api Functional Test - nasa/cFE#1798, update in/out status and nonnull/nonzero tags - nasa/cFE#1783, Add External Time Source Functional Tests - nasa/cFE#1800, Add Perf API functional tests Co-authored-by: Jacob Hageman <skliper@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Joseph Hickey <jphickey@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Alex Campbell <zanzaben@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Niall Mullane <nmullane@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Paul <pavll@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Describe the contribution
Fixes #807
Add ES Application Behavior Functional Tests
Testing performed
Build and run unit test
Expected behavior changes
No impact to behavior
System(s) tested on
Ubuntu 20.04
Additional context
CFE_ES_ExitApp was not directly tested. #1761 will be needed to test that.
Contributor Info - All information REQUIRED for consideration of pull request
Alex Campbell GSFC