Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #147, reorganize source files #148

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 30, 2023
Merged

Conversation

jphickey
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the contribution
Organize source files into a directory and naming pattern that is compliant with the CFE current recommended practice.

Configurable items are moved to the respective header files and documentation is added to indicate what they do.

Fixes #147

Testing performed
Build and run tests

Expected behavior changes
None

System(s) tested on
Debian

Additional context
Makes CI_LAB more compliant with CFS coding patterns

Contributor Info - All information REQUIRED for consideration of pull request
Joseph Hickey, Vantage Systems, Inc.

fsw/src/ci_lab_dispatch.c Fixed Show fixed Hide fixed
/* */
/* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **/

void CI_LAB_ProcessGroundCommand(const CFE_SB_Buffer_t *SBBufPtr)

Check notice

Code scanning / CodeQL-coding-standard

Long function without assertion Note

All functions of more than 10 lines should have at least one assertion.
/* Verify command packet length */
/* */
/* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **/
bool CI_LAB_VerifyCmdLength(const CFE_MSG_Message_t *MsgPtr, size_t ExpectedLength)

Check notice

Code scanning / CodeQL-coding-standard

Long function without assertion Note

All functions of more than 10 lines should have at least one assertion.
Organize source files into a directory and naming pattern that is
compliant with the CFE current recommended practice.

Configurable items are moved to the respective header files and
documentation is added to indicate what they do.
/* 3. Request for housekeeping telemetry packet (from HS task) */
/* */
/* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * */
void CI_LAB_TaskPipe(const CFE_SB_Buffer_t *SBBufPtr)

Check notice

Code scanning / CodeQL-coding-standard

Long function without assertion Note

All functions of more than 10 lines should have at least one assertion.
@jphickey jphickey added the CCB:Ready Pull request is ready for discussion at the Configuration Control Board (CCB) label Oct 25, 2023
@dzbaker dzbaker added CCB:Approved Indicates code approval by CCB and removed CCB:Ready Pull request is ready for discussion at the Configuration Control Board (CCB) labels Oct 26, 2023
dzbaker added a commit to nasa/cFS that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2023
*Combines:*

sample_app v1.3.0-rc4+dev56
ci_lab v2.5.0-rc4+dev51
sch_lab v2.5.0-rc4+dev61

**Includes:**

*sample_app*
- nasa/sample_app#189
- nasa/sample_app#195
- nasa/sample_app#198
- nasa/sample_app#201
- nasa/sample_app#205
- nasa/sample_app#208
- nasa/sample_app#209

*ci_lab*
- nasa/ci_lab#148

*sch_lab*
- nasa/sch_lab#151

Co-authored by: Avi Weiss <thnkslprpt@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored by: Joseph Hickey <jphickey@users.noreply.github.com>
@dzbaker dzbaker mentioned this pull request Oct 30, 2023
2 tasks
@dzbaker dzbaker merged commit f20ae39 into nasa:main Oct 30, 2023
11 checks passed
dzbaker added a commit to nasa/cFS that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2023
*Combines:*

sample_app v1.3.0-rc4+dev56
ci_lab v2.5.0-rc4+dev51
sch_lab v2.5.0-rc4+dev61

**Includes:**

*sample_app*
- nasa/sample_app#189
- nasa/sample_app#195
- nasa/sample_app#198
- nasa/sample_app#201
- nasa/sample_app#205
- nasa/sample_app#208
- nasa/sample_app#209

*ci_lab*
- nasa/ci_lab#148

*sch_lab*
- nasa/sch_lab#151

Co-authored by: Avi Weiss <thnkslprpt@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored by: Joseph Hickey <jphickey@users.noreply.github.com>
@jphickey jphickey deleted the fix-147-reorg branch November 16, 2023 13:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CCB:Approved Indicates code approval by CCB
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update directory structure to follow current convention
2 participants