-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
"BMS Energy Throughput" seems off. #299
Comments
Thanks! We did originally fix the scale on this, then I seem to have reverted it 4825394. |
FWIW, I tracked this for a while and its in watts, scale : 0.001. Its supposed to be the energy counter that drives BMS Cycle Count, but it is uint16 and wraps every 65kWh, making it hard to use for anything useful. The metric that I use that makes more sense is a template Battery Energy Total. This is the sum of Charge Energy Total and Discharge Energy Total, similar to the above, but uint32 so it does not wrap,and tracks battery use since install. As BMS Cycle Count also counts from installation, it then makes sense to track Battery Energy per Cycle by dividing Battery Energy Total by BMS Cycle Count. |
Yeah, there's a discussion in #110. We disable this sensor by default these days, precisely because it wraps and is of questionable value -- it's only in for back compat reasons really. |
Great that will be fixed, thanks, but after seeing the discussion I believe I'll disable it at once. |
It's already closed :) |
Hey @canton7,
may be worthwhile having a look at the scaling for BMS Energy Throughput while you're at it, I'm on version 1.5.2 at the moment.
It seems little off to me that ~700kWh have gone through my battery today!
After quick inspection, seems to be a U16 starting at 11049 in my H1.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: