Add Ubiquiti INS-3AF-O-G PoE adapter

[BarbarossaTM]

No description provided.

[danner26]

Hello @BarbarossaTM I do not think this is the correct way to model this. Instead, you should have 1 interface with PoE Mode set to Powered Device PD for the internal end (PoE in side), and the second interface with PoE Mode set to Power Sourcing PSE for the PoE out side

[BarbarossaTM]

Hm, I can see why you would want to model it this way. For me there are two reasons for rather choosing Front/Rear Port:

a) In my understanding an Interface terminates an L2 connection, which doesn't happen here, L2+-wise this thing is totally transparent, arguebly even L1-wise.
b) I want to be able to trace from the switch to the connected WiFi backhaul gear / see it directly on the switches interfaces page / the API, which I loose if these are interfaces.

What do you think?

[danner26]

Hmm I see all of your points, let me pose this to the maintainers and lets see what the collective thinks

[BarbarossaTM]

Hey @danner26, did the collective come up with a verdict? :-D

[danner26]

We are torn on it, pretty much 50/50. So as a last ditch effort, just to cover all of my bases, I am going to pose the question to the community.. If I dont reach back out in a few days please ping me again! I am sorry for the delay

[danner26]

This discussion includes the poll

[danner26]

Alright we are going with what you have! The majority has decided. Thanks for waiting while we figured that out

[BarbarossaTM]

Awesome, thanks!