Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

VPN Tunnels #5845

Closed
rhys-g-jones opened this issue Feb 21, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

VPN Tunnels #5845

rhys-g-jones opened this issue Feb 21, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels
pending closure Requires immediate attention to avoid being closed for inactivity status: revisions needed This issue requires additional information to be actionable

Comments

@rhys-g-jones
Copy link

rhys-g-jones commented Feb 21, 2021

I know this has been requested in the past and its be turned down rather quickly i believe

In light of the shift to SD-WAN technologies and Tunnels being used to services like Azure and AWS, it would be great to be able to track these connections in Netbox, Circuits i agree are not the correct place for this type of connection but i would like to know peoples thoughts to now considering a dedicated section for Site to Site VPNs or Tunnels

While these don't have guaranteed speeds and fixed mediums they are becoming much more prevalent in todays networking

this is the only major aspect i see missing in netbox

Thanks

Rhys

@xkilian
Copy link

xkilian commented Feb 21, 2021

Maybe this could be a starting point or continuation for your needs: https://github.com/vapor-ware/netbox-virtual-circuit-plugin

@DanSheps
Copy link
Member

This issue is pending closure as it does not conform to one of the provided templates as required by the contributing guide. If you'd like to request that your issue be re-opened, please first update the content so that it matches the appropriate template (this may require rewriting your issue entirely).

@DanSheps DanSheps added status: revisions needed This issue requires additional information to be actionable pending closure Requires immediate attention to avoid being closed for inactivity labels Feb 22, 2021
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Mar 19, 2021

This issue has been automatically closed due to lack of activity. In an effort to reduce noise, please do not comment any further. Note that the core maintainers may elect to reopen this issue at a later date if deemed necessary.

@stale stale bot closed this as completed Mar 19, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 18, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
pending closure Requires immediate attention to avoid being closed for inactivity status: revisions needed This issue requires additional information to be actionable
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants