Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing some top-level variants for aggregation terms #310

Open
marshall007 opened this issue Nov 10, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

Missing some top-level variants for aggregation terms #310

marshall007 opened this issue Nov 10, 2016 · 0 comments

Comments

@marshall007
Copy link
Contributor

Top-level variants for all terms were added in rethinkdb/rethinkdb#4846. Further down in that thread we decided to go ahead and implement all of them, not just the one's mentioned in my initial comment (which is probably why these were overlooked):

  • r.group
  • r.reduce
  • r.count
  • r.contains
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants