Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Can all decks be seen together in "All boards" view? #323

Closed
flixman opened this issue Oct 9, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

Comments

@flixman
Copy link

flixman commented Oct 9, 2017

Sorry for using the "Issues" section, but I do not know how to place this request properly. Is there any way / can be added as a request to see all decks together in "All boards" view?

Thank you!
Felix

@juliusknorr
Copy link
Member

@flixman Thanks for your feature request. Can you describe a bit more in detail, what you have in mind?

I currently plan to add a nice startup screen, that shows an overview of the cards with nearing due dates and maybe also cards that were assigned to you, (see #12 for that) but I'm not sure if I understood your request correct.

@flixman
Copy link
Author

flixman commented Oct 10, 2017

@juliushaertl Hi! Sure: The idea is: in the app there is a vertical area in the left (%15 of the screen size) with contains the name with the different decks, together with "All boards" and "Archived Boards". In this startup screen. I think that makes sense for "All boards" to show all the decks together. The reason for that is: if I am using Decks to track a number of projects, would be very nice to have a global overview of all of them together.

It's just an idea, but thank you for answering! :-)

@juliusknorr
Copy link
Member

@flixman Ok. Well just showing all stacks with cards from all of the projects might not be the best option, since those can be quite a lot. The plan with #12 is basically to provide an overview of the cards that are important right now. So it is going to be kind of a global overview, but filtered to what is important. I'm closing this in favour of #12

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants