You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At the time of writing the latest version of NC supported by NCP (1.54.0) is 28.0.5.
I would therefore expect nc-update-nextcloud to not update past this version, or at least throw a warning.
Instead it is possible to (accidentally) enter "29.0.0" and the update will just start running without warning.
(If this behavior is intended, I think documentation could be improved to better explain why this will not cause issues.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Well it is intended but may cause issues. If you want to update to the latest supported version, you can simply enter "0". If you enter a specific version, it will perform the upgrade as requested.
I think this is mostly a UX issue that will be resolved once I get around to rewriting the web interface.
@theCalcaholic Thanks for your comment and amazing work.
I should probably have noted that the observation goes for both the web UI as the terminal application ncp-config, which I was using.
Because updating to the latest supported version (using "0") is not possible when a machine is multiple majors behind, I was manually updating it to "27.0.0", "28.0.0", "29.0.0", "Wait... That one shouldn't even be supported, right?" Double checks release notes while update to NC29 is running. "No, I think it shouldn't. So... whoops?"
But if not, why had it just started, without warning? This created the tiniest bit of doubt for me: Did I misunderstand something about nc-update-nextcloud? I'm glad to learn I didn't and this is indeed mostly a UX issue.
At the time of writing the latest version of NC supported by NCP (1.54.0) is 28.0.5.
I would therefore expect
nc-update-nextcloud
to not update past this version, or at least throw a warning.Instead it is possible to (accidentally) enter "29.0.0" and the update will just start running without warning.
(If this behavior is intended, I think documentation could be improved to better explain why this will not cause issues.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: