-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 709
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Salmon and/or Kallisto #171
Comments
@ewels thanks for opening this issue. I was going to speak to you about this but I thought it is not ready yet.
It works at the moment, we use it in our local HPC. But, it is needs some more work like:
About, adding a separate pipeline or not: I think no need for new pipeline. These new quantification methods can be added as optional features to existing pipeline. So, if it will be run without any added "new" flags like e.g. "--run-transcript-quant" it will run only gene_expression as it does now. P.S: I wish I could come to Tubingen Hackaton to discuss but, unfortunately I am too busy developing QTL mapping pipeline :D |
Ooh DEXSeq and Leafcutter! How exciting! +1 for beyond-the-gene-model |
Hi there! @kerimoff , I really would like to have salmon here. Is there a branch with the tools you already have even if they are not part of the container? I would be happy to help in any way to get this done, I would love to run this pipeline with that option. Thanks |
Hi @lpantano , Let me know if you have further questions, |
cool, thanks! is still the idea to integrate it in this repo? |
As soon as possible ;) |
Hello! I was in the middle of adding HTSeq because I thought it solved the problem of the union exon model. However, it doesn't:
Since I was already working on upgrading the gene expression quantifier, and have used Salmon before, AND @kerimoff already has it working, I can integrate that fairly quickly. RSEM I have not used before and would need more time to integrate it. What do you think? |
👍 from me! It's also nice because there are MultiQC module(s) for both Salmon and RSEM, making the reporting very useful. If there is something missing in these modules, we could add that as well. |
Also bioconda recipes available for both - you could create a PR with updating the environment again, dropping HTSeq but including Salmon + RSEM there as a start. |
I agree this is a very important feature. I did in my repo as well, since I was waiting to see what happens here. Whoever can do it first, should do it. And if one is quicker to other to integrate, I would do one before the other. |
I guess you could jointly work on adding it if you already have experience in working on it. (I'm on vacation fairly soon so won't be able to help a lot after June 07th till 20th), but happy to review afterward. Also, I think there are a couple of others who'd be capable to have a look and review while I'm gone 👍 |
@olgabot, I am totally ok if you can do it, but I would do it in another PR, adding one feature at a time if that makes sense. Happy to help if needed. I have it added like this here:
let's do it! |
Added |
It's been at the back of my mind for a while now that it could be nice to add in the option to run Salmon and/or Kallisto. This could be instead of STAR/HiSAT + featureCounts or even in addition to.
Looking through forks of this pipeline, some people have already implemented this. Notably
@kerimoff with Salmon (diff here) and @lconde-ucl with Kallisto (diff here).
Thoughts and feedback welcome! Should this be a separate pipeline (rnaquant?) or would it be good in this rnaseq pipeline?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: