Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

amplicon mode #108

Closed
egenomics opened this issue Jan 30, 2020 · 5 comments
Closed

amplicon mode #108

egenomics opened this issue Jan 30, 2020 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested

Comments

@egenomics
Copy link

egenomics commented Jan 30, 2020

Hi,
It would be a cool enhancement to have an "amplicon mode" for targeted sequencing (i.e. illumina cancer panels, etc).
Probably the big differences with what there is the inclusion of a manifest (bed file with targeted regions).

QC [fastqc+multiqc]
alignment [bwa-mem]
[deduplication?]<-probably not needed
variant calling [gatk,strelka]

Quality control for target capture experiments:
https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/TEQC.html

CNV:
Currently using CoNVaDING. I am sure there are better alternatives out there.
https://github.com/molgenis/CoNVaDING
Probably a good alternative is CNVkit: https://cnvkit.readthedocs.io/en/stable/

Calculation of coverages in the targeted regions, gene level and exon level.

@maxulysse maxulysse self-assigned this Feb 3, 2020
@maxulysse maxulysse added enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested labels Feb 3, 2020
@egenomics
Copy link
Author

A very good package for the calculation of coverages would be
https://github.com/brentp/mosdepth

It looks like it can be integrated into multiQC as well.

@maxulysse
Copy link
Member

@szilvajuhos Do you think mosdepth could be a solution for #70?

@szilvajuhos
Copy link
Contributor

Short answer is yes, the long answer is that we also have to integrate into MultiQC ;)

@maxulysse
Copy link
Member

I think what @egenomics meant it that it was in MultiQC already: https://multiqc.info/docs/#mosdepth

@maxulysse
Copy link
Member

Hi @egenomics, we just released 2.6, and we now include CNVkit, and the new parameter --skip_markduplicates allow to skip the MarkDuplicates process.
So I think I can finally close this issue.
Thanks a lot for all your suggestions

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants