Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ARCitect is taking signikficantly long times to save a file. #320

Open
jagdish7396 opened this issue Jan 6, 2025 · 14 comments
Open

ARCitect is taking signikficantly long times to save a file. #320

jagdish7396 opened this issue Jan 6, 2025 · 14 comments
Assignees
Labels
Type: Bug Something is not working, and it is confirmed by maintainers to be a bug.

Comments

@jagdish7396
Copy link

jagdish7396 commented Jan 6, 2025

I have been facing with the ARCitect software. Specifically, when I create a material sheet for a study and attempt to save it, the software takes an excessively long time to process. For small studies, it buffers for over 10 minutes, and for larger studies containing hundreds of observations, the waiting time is significantly longer.

This delay is severely impacting the workflow.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Status: Needs Triage This item is up for investigation. label Jan 6, 2025
@jagdish7396
Copy link
Author

Screenshot 2025-01-06 114900

@jagdish7396
Copy link
Author

Also sometimes the screen compleletely turns into white
Screenshot 2025-01-06 121155

@Brilator
Copy link
Member

Brilator commented Jan 6, 2025

Hi @jagdish7396, where is your ARC stored?

@jagdish7396
Copy link
Author

in the downloads folder

@Brilator
Copy link
Member

Brilator commented Jan 6, 2025

Ok, thanks. I'm asking, since we ran into issues with ARCs stored on network drives, hard drives or cloud folders.

@jagdish7396
Copy link
Author

hello Brilator, is the issue solved? Any solution that you have found or any suggestions you give to streamline the process would be of a great help to me. Thank you so much.

@Brilator
Copy link
Member

Brilator commented Jan 9, 2025

Can you please create a fresh ARC with only a few studies and check whether you run into the same issue? Thanks

@Brilator
Copy link
Member

Brilator commented Jan 9, 2025

Is this the same ARC that created the issue #319 ?

@jagdish7396
Copy link
Author

yes it is the same ARC what created issue #319 but then i deleted those files that and recreated them using ARCItect

@Brilator
Copy link
Member

Brilator commented Jan 9, 2025

Do you run into the same issue when creating a fresh ARC with only a few studies and samples?

@jagdish7396
Copy link
Author

issue #319 was i could not open an ARC itself due to incompatible files(created or modified out side the ARCitect locally oúsing excel) . i corrected that and now the issue is ARCitect is taking too long to save a material sheet created within ARCitect.

@Brilator
Copy link
Member

Brilator commented Jan 9, 2025

Can you please create a fresh ARC with only a few studies and check whether you run into the same issue? Thanks

Have you tried this?

@JonasLukasczyk
Copy link
Collaborator

It looks like this is a pretty big ARC and ARCtrl currently has problems with those. Does the save process ever finish? Otherwise you might have ran into another silent error. @HLWeil

@JonasLukasczyk JonasLukasczyk added Type: Bug Something is not working, and it is confirmed by maintainers to be a bug. and removed Status: Needs Triage This item is up for investigation. labels Jan 13, 2025
@jagdish7396
Copy link
Author

It looks like this is a pretty big ARC and ARCtrl currently has problems with those. Does the save process ever finish? Otherwise you might have ran into another silent error. @HLWeil

Yes, the save process was finishing. But, it took really a long time. sometimes upto half an hour for the material sheets with more than 3000 observations/plants

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Type: Bug Something is not working, and it is confirmed by maintainers to be a bug.
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants