Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Operator - Image registry consolidation #273

Open
1 task done
danielnginx opened this issue Apr 8, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
1 task done

Operator - Image registry consolidation #273

danielnginx opened this issue Apr 8, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
needs more info Issues that require more information refined Issues that are ready to be prioritized

Comments

@danielnginx
Copy link

danielnginx commented Apr 8, 2024

Review all the container registries that we use in the operator project and consolidate them to use Quay when possible.

Examples:

image: gcr.io/kubebuilder/kube-rbac-proxy:v0.13.1

Related issue, #336, was closed by issuer as "self resolved. the changes persisted."

Tasks

  1. jjngx pdabelf5
@danielnginx danielnginx added the ready for refinement An issue that was triaged and it is ready to be refined label Apr 8, 2024
@brianehlert
Copy link
Collaborator

The ask from the customer is to use trusted F5 NGINX container registries.
The goal is that the operator is easy for customers that are offline.
And the installation of the operator cannot dynamically pull from registries because of corporate security policy.
In this case each image registry needs to be expressly trusted and approved by the security team.

@danielnginx danielnginx added refined Issues that are ready to be prioritized and removed ready for refinement An issue that was triaged and it is ready to be refined labels Apr 18, 2024
@blediagolli
Copy link

To add to this, is there a way to point to a private registry that is hosting the necessary images for the operator? I am having to host the kube-rbac-proxy image in our private repo and everywhere I change it, the operator reverts to the gcr.io registry.

@danielnginx danielnginx added the needs more info Issues that require more information label Jul 23, 2024
@vepatel
Copy link
Contributor

vepatel commented Jul 23, 2024

related: #336

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs more info Issues that require more information refined Issues that are ready to be prioritized
Projects
Status: Prioritized backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants