feat(Schematics): use ofType operator function instead of Actions#ofType #1154
Conversation
| ); | ||
| expect(content).toMatch(/export class FooEffects/); | ||
| expect(content).toMatch( | ||
| /effect\$ = this\.actions\$.pipe\(ofType<LoadFoos>\(FooActionTypes\.LoadFoos\)\);/ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe rename effects$ to loadFoos$?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for your comment!
I renamed "effect$" to "loadFoos$".
It's more suitable in this case.
| @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ describe('Effect Schematic', () => { | |||
| appTree = createWorkspace(schematicRunner, appTree); | |||
| }); | |||
|
|
|||
| it('should create an effect', () => { | |||
| it('should create an effect file and its spec file', () => { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This should be should create an effect with a spec file.
| @@ -50,6 +50,44 @@ describe('Effect Schematic', () => { | |||
| ).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(0); | |||
| }); | |||
|
|
|||
| it('should create an effect class which has a "loadFoos$" property if feature is set', () => { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This should be should create an effect that describes a source of actions within a feature.
And maybe move the test a bit down? (after the default tests)
| ); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| it('should create an effect class which does not have a "loadFoos$" property if root is set', () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This should be should create an effect that does not define a source of actions within the root.
And maybe move the test a bit down? (after the default tests)
|
@tdeschryver |
| @Effect() | ||
| effect$ = this.actions$.ofType(<%= classify(name) %>ActionTypes.Load<%= classify(name) %>s); | ||
| loadFoos$ = this.actions$.pipe(ofType<Load<%= classify(name) %>s>(<%= classify(name) %>ActionTypes.Load<%= classify(name) %>s)); | ||
| <% } %> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove the <Load<%= classify(name) %>s>
koumatsumoto
force-pushed
the
update-effect-schematics-with-of-type-operator-function
branch
from
beec706 to
851bf21
Compare
|
@brandonroberts |
I suppose that we should use ofType operator function instead of Actions#ofType in generated files by schematics.
Please consider this change, thank you!