You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I needed to build gcc 5.5.0. I have used your excellent script before with success in the past.
So, I cloned the repository and tried to do the build process and an error occurred, the same one reported here. I decided to investigate and created a patch for it. The problem passed, but new errors appeared, from possible incompatibilities of the previous gcc code with the toolchain using 12.2.0. I decided to use gcc 4.9.4 for construction and OK. The error was now building Python 3 with the old gcc. At this point I gave up on that approach in trying to fix bugs in devel.
I then looked for something that would indicate the last known successful build of gcc 5.5.0. I found commit f649dac. I regressed to it and built gcc 5.5.0 after correcting the links to expat and isl.
Well, I have proven with tests that changing the toolchain causes regressions in the build. Another regression that I assume has to do with this error was introduced in this commit 90a6683, but I didn't get to test it.
After saying all that, I believe the best way to control regressions would be to keep a file indicating the commit that each version was built correctly to facilitate the correction.
I verified that there is a choice of dependency versions according to the built version. This could be done with the toolchain as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
for the first post: you are right, that is a known trouble with mingw-builds projects. but I have no idea how to solve such troubles conveniently...
maybe you have some ideas?
Another question: how necessary is it to update the toolchain?
are you talking about a toolchain used as host compiler?
I don't have a suggestion. What could be done, at least for those who use it and want to investigate why a previous version broke, is to create a file in the repository, lastcommitbuilt.md for example, pointing to gcc vx.x.x and the hash of the last one commit which compiled correctly. It can be a starting point for a contribution with corrections in the model that the current script is, considering that script debugging can be very time consuming.
are you talking about a toolchain used as host compiler?
Yes, I'm talking about the host compiler, which is in "config-win.sh".
I needed to build gcc 5.5.0. I have used your excellent script before with success in the past.
So, I cloned the repository and tried to do the build process and an error occurred, the same one reported here. I decided to investigate and created a patch for it. The problem passed, but new errors appeared, from possible incompatibilities of the previous gcc code with the toolchain using 12.2.0. I decided to use gcc 4.9.4 for construction and OK. The error was now building Python 3 with the old gcc. At this point I gave up on that approach in trying to fix bugs in devel.
I then looked for something that would indicate the last known successful build of gcc 5.5.0. I found commit f649dac. I regressed to it and built gcc 5.5.0 after correcting the links to expat and isl.
Well, I have proven with tests that changing the toolchain causes regressions in the build. Another regression that I assume has to do with this error was introduced in this commit 90a6683, but I didn't get to test it.
After saying all that, I believe the best way to control regressions would be to keep a file indicating the commit that each version was built correctly to facilitate the correction.
I verified that there is a choice of dependency versions according to the built version. This could be done with the toolchain as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: