You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I personally really like Wilson et al, but truly there are no one paper that talk about all aspects of reproducibility. Wilson et al focuses on software / coding aspects, but we should accompany this with data management aspects (eg, data annotation / provenance, I often have students listen to This snafu and statistical best practices (maybe some of the Ioannidis ones)
sorry for the late reply, I think the Button et al 2013 is probably good for the power aspects, but there might be better ones for more general exposition (including winners curse, file drawer, p-hacking, etc). At the moment, I basically have one per topic.
1.Button, K. S. et al. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 14, 365–376 (2013).
Hey @jbpoline - and y'all.
What is the best article / source for the students to read about reproducibility, do you think?
We previously suggested:
See: https://bic-berkeley.github.io/psych-214-fall-2016/day_00.html
Are there other, better references we can point them to, on the general problem of reproducibility?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: