Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cannot configure blackhole route: "unknown field route-type" #1222

Open
nirs opened this issue Dec 14, 2023 · 7 comments
Open

Cannot configure blackhole route: "unknown field route-type" #1222

nirs opened this issue Dec 14, 2023 · 7 comments

Comments

@nirs
Copy link

nirs commented Dec 14, 2023

What happened:

Install release 0.80.1 on OpenShift 4.14.3 based on
https://github.com/nmstate/kubernetes-nmstate/releases/tag/v0.80.1

Applied this policy:

kind: NodeNetworkConfigurationPolicy
metadata:
  name: blackhole-perf2
spec:
  desiredState:
    routes:
      config:
        - destination: 1.2.3.10/32
          route-type: blackhole

route-type was added here:
nmstate/nmstate#2453

Policy failed to configure:

apiVersion: nmstate.io/v1beta1
kind: NodeNetworkConfigurationEnactment
metadata:
  creationTimestamp: "2023-12-14T01:36:13Z"
  generation: 1
  labels:
    nmstate.io/node: perf1-d8zsg-master-0
    nmstate.io/policy: blackhole-perf2
  name: perf1-d8zsg-master-0.blackhole-perf2
  ownerReferences:
  - apiVersion: v1
    kind: Node
    name: perf1-d8zsg-master-0
    uid: c0caa7a6-8d9b-45e2-87d9-21c004b18467
  resourceVersion: "10450770"
  uid: aac91a33-ab3b-49c9-96ce-71ccc6bcac02
status:
  conditions:
  - lastHeartbeatTime: "2023-12-14T01:37:12Z"
    lastTransitionTime: "2023-12-14T01:37:12Z"
    reason: FailedToConfigure
    status: "False"
    type: Progressing
  - lastHeartbeatTime: "2023-12-14T01:37:12Z"
    lastTransitionTime: "2023-12-14T01:37:12Z"
    message: |-
      error reconciling NodeNetworkConfigurationPolicy on node perf1-d8zsg-master-0 at desired state apply: "",
       failed to execute nmstatectl set --no-commit --timeout 480: 'exit status 1' '' 'Using 'set' is deprecated, use 'apply' instead.
      Provide file is not valid NetworkState or NetworkPolicy: unknown field `route-type`, expected one of `state`, `destination`, `next-hop-interface`, `next-hop-address`, `metric`, `table-id`, `weight`
      '
    reason: FailedToConfigure
    status: "True"
    type: Failing
  - lastHeartbeatTime: "2023-12-14T01:37:12Z"
    lastTransitionTime: "2023-12-14T01:37:12Z"
    reason: FailedToConfigure
    status: "False"
    type: Available
  - lastHeartbeatTime: "2023-12-14T01:37:12Z"
    lastTransitionTime: "2023-12-14T01:37:11Z"
    reason: FailedToConfigure
    status: "False"
    type: Pending
  - lastHeartbeatTime: "2023-12-14T01:37:12Z"
    lastTransitionTime: "2023-12-14T01:37:11Z"
    reason: SuccessfullyConfigured
    status: "False"
    type: Aborted
  desiredState:
    routes:
      config:
      - destination: 1.2.3.10/32
        route-type: blackhole
  desiredStateMetaInfo: {}
  policyGeneration: 2

What you expected to happen:

blackhole route configured.

How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible):

See what happened

Anything else we need to know?:

Environment:

  • NetworkManager version (use nmcli --version)
# nmcli --version
nmcli tool, version 1.42.2-8.el9_2
  • Kubernetes version (use kubectl version):
$ oc version
Client Version: 4.13.4
Kustomize Version: v4.5.7
Server Version: 4.14.3
Kubernetes Version: v1.27.6+b49f9d1
  • OS (e.g. from /etc/os-release):
# cat /etc/os-release 
NAME="Red Hat Enterprise Linux CoreOS"
ID="rhcos"
ID_LIKE="rhel fedora"
VERSION="414.92.202311150705-0"
VERSION_ID="4.14"
VARIANT="CoreOS"
VARIANT_ID=coreos
PLATFORM_ID="platform:el9"
PRETTY_NAME="Red Hat Enterprise Linux CoreOS 414.92.202311150705-0 (Plow)"
ANSI_COLOR="0;31"
CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9::coreos"
HOME_URL="https://www.redhat.com/"
DOCUMENTATION_URL="https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.14/"
BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/"
REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT="OpenShift Container Platform"
REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT_VERSION="4.14"
REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="OpenShift Container Platform"
REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT_VERSION="4.14"
OPENSHIFT_VERSION="4.14"
RHEL_VERSION="9.2"
OSTREE_VERSION="414.92.202311150705-0"

I guess route-type is not included in the latest release?

Why I want it: replace the manual ip route on every node here:
https://github.com/nirs/oc-blackhole

@qinqon
Copy link
Member

qinqon commented Jan 4, 2024

@nirs can you dump a NNS so we can see the nmstate version ?

@qinqon
Copy link
Member

qinqon commented Jan 8, 2024

@cathay4t is this configuration supported at RHEL 9.2 ?

    routes:
      config:
        - destination: 1.2.3.10/32
          route-type: blackhole

@nirs
Copy link
Author

nirs commented Jan 8, 2024

@nirs can you dump a NNS so we can see the nmstate version ?

I think I already uninstalled nmstate on this system, but the version was this:
https://github.com/nmstate/kubernetes-nmstate/releases/tag/v0.80.1

@maiqueb
Copy link
Contributor

maiqueb commented Feb 4, 2024

@cathay4t is this configuration supported at RHEL 9.2 ?

    routes:
      config:
        - destination: 1.2.3.10/32
          route-type: blackhole

@nirs do you know if this is working in nmstate ?

@qinqon assuming this setting is exposed by nmstate, is anything holding this feature back ? Seems a reasonable and simple ask.

@nirs
Copy link
Author

nirs commented Feb 4, 2024

@maiqueb I assume this works in nmstate based on nmstate/nmstate#2453 merged Nov 24, 2023.

@qinqon
Copy link
Member

qinqon commented Feb 12, 2024

@nirs is https://github.com/nmstate/kubernetes-nmstate/releases/tag/v0.81.0 working for you ?

It has nmstateversion 2.2.22

# nmstatectl version
nmstatectl 2.2.22

From what I see it was merged on 2.2.20
nmstate/nmstate@f8c57a8

@nirs
Copy link
Author

nirs commented Feb 12, 2024

@nirs is https://github.com/nmstate/kubernetes-nmstate/releases/tag/v0.81.0 working for you ?

Thanks, will test it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants