-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Creating input variables NetCDF file for improved testing #25
Comments
@drnimbusrain Sure, I definitely can do that. Just to clarify, should netCDF4 file include 1D or 2D variables? Or you want to make it flexible? |
I would suggest making it 2-D, since that seems more natural, but maybe we can try to design so that it would be possible to load 1-D as well |
OK, I will generate both 1D and 2D inputs for testing, we can determine this later |
I like this plan @angehung5 and @zmoon. The canopy-app may be mainly driven by 2D surface variables, but I can imagine there are some 1D variables that could be used. One other thing to decide is what is our NetCDF file format/convention. We should follow some standard as best as possible for both the input and optional output NetCDF (e.g., latitude, longitude, time, height, etc.) and associated variable attributes. Maybe CF convention? https://cfconventions.org/Data/cf-standard-names/current/build/cf-standard-name-table.html |
Yeah for sure we should try to make nice output files, following CF, i.e. making sure all have |
yes, detailed descriptions would be helpful. I will add add them in the file. |
@angehung5 @zmoon Closing this issue. |
@angehung5 Do you think you can make an input gridded, NetCDF file that is identical to the current develop input_variables.txt file?
As shown in Issue #22 , we want to also add an option in canopy-app for both inputting and outputting NetCDF gridded files to improve testing and assessment of different modules.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: