Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Node.js releasers email alias? #663

Closed
BethGriggs opened this issue Apr 30, 2021 · 6 comments
Closed

Node.js releasers email alias? #663

BethGriggs opened this issue Apr 30, 2021 · 6 comments

Comments

@BethGriggs
Copy link
Member

Should we create a Node.js releasers email alias? I think it'd be useful when coordinating security releases where we sometimes need to source volunteers more urgently.

My thoughts were that we'd create an alias for @nodejs/releasers based on the emails in the Node.js README.

Are there any concerns around creating the alias/would anyone prefer not be included on the alias? Open to other suggestions too.

@richardlau
Copy link
Member

No objections from me.

@targos
Copy link
Member

targos commented May 1, 2021

I won't object to it, but I generally dislike discussions that happen by email.

@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

We do have this discussion board https://github.com/orgs/nodejs/teams/releasers

@danielleadams
Copy link
Contributor

I'm in favor of email for more urgent concerns.

@danielleadams
Copy link
Contributor

@BethGriggs Do you think the Security Slack group covers the use case for the email alias? If so, can we close this?

@BethGriggs
Copy link
Member Author

@BethGriggs Do you think the Security Slack group covers the use case for the email alias? If so, can we close this?

I think it does, closing. If any one else feels differently please reopen.

@BethGriggs BethGriggs closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jun 23, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants