-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 134
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Node.js Foundation Technical Steering Committee (TSC) Meeting 2018-06-13 #551
Comments
I don't think Of course, it would be good if you discussed it - but you're always looking to make the agenda smaller before meetings so I figured it might help. Let me know if you'd like me to weigh in on "Propose team discussion policy #121" or to explain/elaborate on it. |
I wish I could agree, but @vkurchatkin is -1 on it, so I don't think it can land without TSC approval. @nodejs/tsc: I'd invite you to look closely at that issue as a vote seems likely. It would be great if we could have sufficient opinions formed to be able to get a result on the vote one way or the other. The PR has been open for 3 months and I think the case has been made for both sides pretty thoroughly. For the record, I'm fine with "yes" or "no" on it, but I'm less comfortable with "send it back to GitHub". We're asking a lot (even if it's mostly psychologically) of @boneskull to manage a PR for months without knowing if there's support for the feature or not. Easy link: nodejs/node#19335 |
I will be on a flight back to California this afternoon so will be missing the call. I'm fine with |
I abstain. Not very happy about adding yet another property to |
I abstain too. |
I abstain. |
I'm going to miss the call, it will be at midnight. I'll also miss the next one because I'll be on vacation. |
1 similar comment
I'm going to miss the call, it will be at midnight. I'll also miss the next one because I'll be on vacation. |
I abstain on the |
I'm in favor of |
I'm going to have to pass on the meeting tonight, just to late I'm afraid. |
I abstain on the process.allowedNodeEnvironmentFlags issue. I'm not sure if I'll be able to make it to this one. |
I just added #20242 to the agenda |
@MylesBorins there is also the nomination in nodejs/node#21285 (relatively new) and nodejs/node#21096 - as both are uncontroversial (similarly to #20242) then maybe they should be added too? Note: I am not adding the tsc-agenda label to them or asking for the TSC to review them necessarily, mostly just want to figure out the process :) |
Fell asleep and my alarm did not work for me, sorry |
Belated moderation report for this week:
@nodejs/tsc @nodejs/community-committee @nodejs/moderation More details available upon request. (Contact me in email, IRC DMs, or open an issue in the moderation repo.) |
Time
UTC Wed 13-Jun-2018 22:00 (10:00 PM):
Or in your local time:
Links
Agenda
Extracted from tsc-agenda labelled issues and pull requests from the nodejs org prior to the meeting.
nodejs/node
nodejs/TSC
nodejs/admin
Invited
Observers
Notes
The agenda comes from issues labelled with
tsc-agenda
across all of the repositories in the nodejs org. Please label any additional issues that should be on the agenda before the meeting starts.Joining the meeting
Zoom link: https://zoom.us/j/611357642
Regular password
Public participation
We stream our conference call straight to YouTube so anyone can listen to it live, it should start playing at https://www.youtube.com/c/nodejs+foundation/live when we turn it on. There's usually a short cat-herding time at the start of the meeting and then occasionally we have some quick private business to attend to before we can start recording & streaming. So be patient and it should show up.
Many of us will be on IRC in #node-dev on Freenode if you'd like to interact, we have a Q/A session scheduled at the end of the meeting if you'd like us to discuss anything in particular. @nodejs/collaborators in particular if there's anything you need from the TSC that's not worth putting on as a separate agenda item, this is a good place for that
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: