Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Node.js Foundation Technical Steering Committee (TSC) Meeting 2018-06-13 #551

Closed
mhdawson opened this issue Jun 11, 2018 · 17 comments
Closed
Assignees

Comments

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

mhdawson commented Jun 11, 2018

Time

UTC Wed 13-Jun-2018 22:00 (10:00 PM):

Timezone Date/Time
US / Pacific Wed 13-Jun-2018 15:00 (03:00 PM)
US / Mountain Wed 13-Jun-2018 16:00 (04:00 PM)
US / Central Wed 13-Jun-2018 17:00 (05:00 PM)
US / Eastern Wed 13-Jun-2018 18:00 (06:00 PM)
London Wed 13-Jun-2018 23:00 (11:00 PM)
Amsterdam Thu 14-Jun-2018 00:00 (12:00 AM)
Moscow Thu 14-Jun-2018 01:00 (01:00 AM)
Chennai Thu 14-Jun-2018 03:30 (03:30 AM)
Hangzhou Thu 14-Jun-2018 06:00 (06:00 AM)
Tokyo Thu 14-Jun-2018 07:00 (07:00 AM)
Sydney Thu 14-Jun-2018 08:00 (08:00 AM)

Or in your local time:

Links

Agenda

Extracted from tsc-agenda labelled issues and pull requests from the nodejs org prior to the meeting.

nodejs/node

  • process: add allowedEnvironmentNodeFlags property #19335
  • Nominating bcoe as a collaborator #20242

nodejs/TSC

  • Tracking issue for updating TSC on Board Meetings #476
  • Strategic Initiatives - Tracking Issue #423
  • Proposal: add all new core modules under a scope? (too late for http2) #389

nodejs/admin

  • Propose team discussion policy #121

Invited

Observers

Notes

The agenda comes from issues labelled with tsc-agenda across all of the repositories in the nodejs org. Please label any additional issues that should be on the agenda before the meeting starts.

Joining the meeting

Zoom link: https://zoom.us/j/611357642
Regular password

Public participation

We stream our conference call straight to YouTube so anyone can listen to it live, it should start playing at https://www.youtube.com/c/nodejs+foundation/live when we turn it on. There's usually a short cat-herding time at the start of the meeting and then occasionally we have some quick private business to attend to before we can start recording & streaming. So be patient and it should show up.

Many of us will be on IRC in #node-dev on Freenode if you'd like to interact, we have a Q/A session scheduled at the end of the meeting if you'd like us to discuss anything in particular. @nodejs/collaborators in particular if there's anything you need from the TSC that's not worth putting on as a separate agenda item, this is a good place for that

@mhdawson mhdawson self-assigned this Jun 11, 2018
@benjamingr
Copy link
Member

benjamingr commented Jun 11, 2018

I don't think process: add allowedEnvironmentNodeFlags property needs TSC agenda anymore since the issue is that we weren't sure we need/want it and we were looking for collaborators to endorse it. I ran into a use case today that required it so I'm happy with it.

Of course, it would be good if you discussed it - but you're always looking to make the agenda smaller before meetings so I figured it might help.

Let me know if you'd like me to weigh in on "Propose team discussion policy #121" or to explain/elaborate on it.

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Jun 11, 2018

I don't think process: add allowedEnvironmentNodeFlags property needs TSC agenda anymore since the issue is that we weren't sure we need/want it and we were looking for collaborators to endorse it. I ran into a use case today that required it so I'm happy with it.

I wish I could agree, but @vkurchatkin is -1 on it, so I don't think it can land without TSC approval.

@nodejs/tsc: I'd invite you to look closely at that issue as a vote seems likely. It would be great if we could have sufficient opinions formed to be able to get a result on the vote one way or the other. The PR has been open for 3 months and I think the case has been made for both sides pretty thoroughly.

For the record, I'm fine with "yes" or "no" on it, but I'm less comfortable with "send it back to GitHub". We're asking a lot (even if it's mostly psychologically) of @boneskull to manage a PR for months without knowing if there's support for the feature or not.

Easy link: nodejs/node#19335

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Jun 13, 2018

I will be on a flight back to California this afternoon so will be missing the call.

I'm fine with process.allowedNodeEnvironmentFlags landing tho I'm not thrilled about adding to the process object.

@joyeecheung
Copy link
Member

I abstain. Not very happy about adding yet another property to process, but I do see to point of adding it.

@targos
Copy link
Member

targos commented Jun 13, 2018

I abstain too.

@danbev
Copy link
Contributor

danbev commented Jun 13, 2018

I abstain.

@mcollina
Copy link
Member

I'm going to miss the call, it will be at midnight.

I'll also miss the next one because I'll be on vacation.

1 similar comment
@mcollina
Copy link
Member

I'm going to miss the call, it will be at midnight.

I'll also miss the next one because I'll be on vacation.

@cjihrig
Copy link
Contributor

cjihrig commented Jun 13, 2018

I abstain on the process.allowedNodeEnvironmentFlags issue. I'm not sure if I'll be able to make it to this one.

@mcollina
Copy link
Member

I'm in favor of process.allowedNodeEnvironmentFlags. I LGTM'd the PR.

@danbev
Copy link
Contributor

danbev commented Jun 13, 2018

I'm going to have to pass on the meeting tonight, just to late I'm afraid.

@fhinkel
Copy link
Member

fhinkel commented Jun 13, 2018

I abstain on the process.allowedNodeEnvironmentFlags issue. I'm not sure if I'll be able to make it to this one.

@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

I just added #20242 to the agenda

@benjamingr
Copy link
Member

@MylesBorins there is also the nomination in nodejs/node#21285 (relatively new) and nodejs/node#21096 - as both are uncontroversial (similarly to #20242) then maybe they should be added too?

cc @Trott @thefourtheye

Note: I am not adding the tsc-agenda label to them or asking for the TSC to review them necessarily, mostly just want to figure out the process :)

@joyeecheung
Copy link
Member

Fell asleep and my alarm did not work for me, sorry

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Jun 14, 2018

Minutes PR from @mhdawson at #552. Closing this issue...

@Trott Trott closed this as completed Jun 14, 2018
@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Jun 14, 2018

Belated moderation report for this week:

  • One issue was locked.
  • One spam comment was deleted from a YouTube chat.

@nodejs/tsc @nodejs/community-committee @nodejs/moderation More details available upon request. (Contact me in email, IRC DMs, or open an issue in the moderation repo.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests